Compounds and methods for treating an epileptic disorder

ABSTRACT

Provided, inter alia, are methods for treating an epilepsy disorder using clemizole, a clemizole analog, or pharmaceutical salts thereof.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/213,896, filed Dec. 7, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,695,325, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/892,204, filed Feb. 8, 2018, now pending, which is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 15/047,254, filed Feb. 18, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,925,172, which is a continuation of International Application PCT/US2014/051731, filed Aug. 19, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/867,397, filed Aug. 19, 2013, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under grant number R01 NS079214 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

REFERENCE TO A “SEQUENCE LISTING,” A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING APPENDIX SUBMITTED AS AN ASCII FILE

The Sequence Listing written in file 48536_545C03US_ST25.TXT, created Apr. 30, 2020, 1,200 bytes, machine format IBM-PC, MS-Windows operating system, is hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a catastrophic pediatric epilepsy with severe intellectual disability, impaired social development and persistent drug-resistant seizures. One of its primary causes is mutations in Nav1.1 (SCN1A), a voltage-gated sodium channel. Seizures experienced by those with DS and other epilepsy disorders are inadequately managed using available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and children with DS are poor candidates for neurosurgical resection. Thus there is a need in the art for epilepsy treatment options, especially those for DS and related catastrophic pediatric epilepsies. Provided herein are solutions to these problems and other problems in the art.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided herein, inter alia, are methods of treating epilepsy disorders using clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In one aspect the method includes administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another aspect the method includes administering to a subject in need thereof, a pharmaceutical composition that includes a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Further provided herein are pharmaceutical compositions for treating epilepsy disorders. In one aspect is a pharmaceutical composition that includes clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in treating an epilepsy disorder.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-1E. Molecular characterization of scn1Lab zebrafish mutants. (FIG. 1A) Sequencing confirmed a T-to-G mutation in scn1Lab mutant cDNA. Sequence legend: FMILL (SEQ ID NO:1); TTCATGATTTTACTC (SEQ ID NO:2); FRILL (SEQ ID NO:3); TTCAGGATTTTACTC (SEQ ID NO:4). (FIG. 1B) Verification of reduced expression in scn1Lab mutants compared to sibling controls at 3, 5 and 7 dpf using qPCR. Data presented as mean±S.E.M; *significance taken as p<0.05 student's t-test. Data were normalized to internal reference gene β-actin. Values represent averages from five independent biological samples (1 sample=10 pooled larvae) for each of the 3 developmental stages. Data presented as mean±S.E.M; *significance taken as p<0.05 student's t-test. (FIG. 1C) Relative expression of scn8aa and scn8ab in Na_(v)1.1 mutants (n=5) and sibling controls (n=5) at 5 dpf. Data presented as in B. (FIG. 1D) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for scn1Lab in larval zebrafish at 3, 5 and 7 dpf. Wild-type larvae are shown in lateral views; expression is shown in dark purple. Scn1Laa expression at 3 dpf is shown for comparison. Heart indicated by arrowheads in 5 and 7 dpf panels. (FIG. 1E) Dorsal view of scb1Laa expression at 3 dpf; note prominent expression in regions corresponding to the larval zebrafish CNS. Abbreviations: Tel, telencephalon; TeO, optic tectum; Cb, cerebellum. Scale bars=0.35 mm in D, 0.2 mm in E.

FIGS. 2A-2C. Microarray analysis of scn1Lab zebrafish mutants. (FIG. 2A) Heat maps depicting the expression of genes differentially expressed between scn1Lab mutant and sibling control larvae at 5 dpf. Rows represent individual genes. Columns represent different larvae. Genes that are highly expressed in scn1Lab mutants relative to controls are as shown. (FIG. 2B) MA plot of normalized microarray data for all 44,000 genes. The log-ratio M and the mean fluorescence intensity A were calculated as the averages for all replicates. (FIG. 2C) A list of the top 30 genes showing the greatest differences in expression between scn1Lab mutants and sibling controls.

FIGS. 3A-3C. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of scn1Lab zebrafish mutants. (FIG. 3A) Comparison of the gene expression fold changes obtained by microarray analysis (array) and real-time qPCR analysis. The y-axis represents the average fold change in gene expression of each gene from zebrafish at 5 dpf. The x-axis represents different genes. (FIG. 3B) qPCR analysis of three genes involved in epileptogenesis. The relative gene expression is presented as log₂ ratios to the least abundant transcript (log₂ΔΔct). Data were normalized to internal reference gene β-actin. Values represent averages from five independent biological samples (1 sample 10 pooled larvae). Bars indicate S.E.M; *p<0.05 t-test. (FIG. 3C) Gene ontology classification of differentially expressed genes detected in scn1Lab mutants at 5 dpf (p<0.05 ANOVA one-way and fold changes>1.5). Biological processes representing at least 5 gene annotations in at least one category are displayed.

FIGS. 4A-4C. Spontaneous seizures in scn1Lab zebrafish mutants. (FIG. 4A) Immobilized and agar-embedded zebrafish larvae are shown. Images were obtained using a 4× objective and 2× magnifier on an Olympus upright microscope during forebrain electrophysiological recordings in sibling control (FIG. 4A, left) and scn1Lab mutant (FIG. 4A, middle) larvae at 5 dpf. Note the dark pigmentation for mutants. Recording electrodes can be seen in panels A1-2 and the approximate site of the recording electrode tip in the forebrain (red circle) is shown using a representative HuC:GFP labeled larvae in FIG. 4A, right. Scale bar: 100 μm. (FIG. 4B) Sample locomotion tracking plot for sibling control (FIG. 4B, left) and scn1Lab mutant (FIG. 4B, right) larvae at 5 dpf. (FIG. 4C) Representative 10 min recording epochs obtained in the forebrain of paralyzed, immobilized and agar-embedded scn1Lab mutant larvae between 3 and 7 dpf. Note the presence of small and large amplitude spontaneous burst discharge; additional temporal expansions of seizure activity. A representative recording, under identical recording conditions, from a sibling control larvae at 5 dpf is also shown. Scale bar: 2 mV; 30 sec.

FIGS. 5A-5F. Pharmacological validation of scn1Lab zebrafish mutants. (FIG. 5A) Heat map showing the response to nine different AEDs. Each column represents the percent change in burst frequency (baseline−drug/baseline×100) for one individual zebrafish mutant. Drugs that inhibit seizure events are shown in dark blue. All drugs were tested at a concentration of 1 mM. Note in some trials carbamazepine and vigabatrin increased burst frequency over the initial baseline levels. (FIG. 5B) Plot of the mean change in burst frequency and standard error for the data shown in the heat map. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank sum test for data that failed the normality test showed significance as follows: diazepam (p=0.002; n=7), potassium bromide (p=0.016; n=7), stiripentol (p=0.024; n=7), and valproate (p=0.004; n=7). (FIG. 5C) Plot of the burst duration for all trials shown in FIG. 5A. Data is presented as the mean±S.E.M. for electrographic seizure events at baseline (black bars) and after drug exposure (white bars). Inset shows a representative 2 min recording during the stiripentol trial; scale bars: large trace 1 mV, 1 sec; small trace, 1 mV, 100 msec. (FIG. 5D) Plot of the fractional time spent seizing for all trials shown in FIG. 5A. Data is presented as the mean±S.E.M. for electrographic seizure events at baseline (black bars) and after drug exposure (white bars). Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney-Rank sum test for data that failed the normality test showed significance as follows: diazepam (p=0.001; n=7); potassium bromide (p=0.043; n=7); stiripentol (p=0.007; n=7) and valproate (p=0.007; n=7 (FIG. 5E) Locomotion tracking plots for 10 individual mutant larvae raised in embryo media (top row) or the ketogenic diet for 48 hr. Plots show swim velocity and locomotion tracks with darker colors indicative of higher velocities; 10 min trials are shown. (FIG. 5F) Representative 10 min extracellular recording epochs from the same fish shown in E; representative examples are indicated by an * in the locomotion plots. Scale bar: 1 mV, 30 sec. Inset shows burst at higher temporal resolution (indicated by #); scale bar: 1 mV, 100 msec.

FIGS. 6A-6E. A screen to identify drugs that rescue the scn1Lab mutant epilepsy phenotype. (FIG. 6A) Box plot of mean velocity (in mm/sec) for two consecutive recordings of mutant larvae in embryo media. The experiments were performed by first placing the mutant larvae in embryo media and obtaining a baseline locomotion response, embryo media was then replaced with new embryo media (to mimic the procedure used for test compounds) and a second locomotion response was obtained. The percent change in velocity from baseline (recording #1) vs. experimental (recording #2) is shown. In the boxplot, the bottom and top of the box represent the 25th percentile and the 75th percentile, respectively. The line across the box represents the median value, and the vertical lines encompass the entire range of values. This plot represents normal changes in tracking activity in the absence of a drug challenge. (FIG. 6B) Plot of the effect of eleven known antiepileptic drugs on locomotor seizure behavior in scn1Lab mutants at 5 dpf. Phenotype-based assay was performed in a 96-well format (for example, see panel FIG. 5C1). Bars represent the percent change in mean velocity comparing a baseline recording of mutant seizure activity with the same mutant after a drug application. For all drug studies 6-12 fish were used per experiment. Drugs were tested at a concentration of 1 mM; diazepam (Dzp; p<0.001), carbamazepine (Carb, p=0.024), ganaxolone (Gan; p=0.003), stiripentol (Stp; p=0.001), valproate (Vpa, p=0.026) and a 48 hr exposure to the ketogenic diet (KD; p=0.003) reduced seizure activity, measured as a change in velocity, by more than 34% (dotted line in B; represents a fold-change greater than the standard deviation in control recordings). Acetazolamide (Acet, p<0.001) and ethosuximide (Etx; p=0.250) increased seizure behavior; levetiracetam (Lev; p=0.243), and lamotrigine (Ltg; p=0.058) had no effect. (FIG. 6C) Plot of locomotor seizure behavior for scn1Laab mutants at 5 dpf for the 320 compounds tested. Colored circles represent positive hits; compounds that decreased activity by 100% were generally toxic; 6-12 fish per trial. Arrowhead denotes the first clemizole trial. Note some compounds increased seizure activity, as expected. (FIG. 6D) Plot of drug re-trials on separate clutches of scn1Lab mutants at 5 dpf; 100 μM per drug; 10 fish per trial. Abbreviations: Clem, clemizole; Clem+PTZ, clemizole+15 mM PTZ; Clorg, clorgiline; Tolp, tolperisone; Zox, zoxazolamine. Effect of acute clemizole on PTZ-induced seizure behavior is shown for wild-type larvae. Bars represent mean±S.E.M. For panels FIG. 6B and FIG. 6D: Student's paired t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test with significance set at p=0.01 (*) or p<0.001 (**). (FIG. 6E) Sample electrophysiology recordings from scn1Lab mutants exposed to clemizole first in the locomotion assay (panel FIG. 6D) and then monitored using a forebrain extracellular recording electrode (top trace; ictal-like burst shown in inset). Similar traces are shown for an un-treated Na_(v)1.1 mutant (middle trace) and a mutant treated with zoxazolamine (bottom trace). Analysis of bursting for un-treated mutants (n=3): burst frequency=1.5±0.3 bursts/min; burst duration=926±414 msec; fractional time spent seizing=0.73±0.17% vs. clemizole-treated mutants (n=7): burst frequency=0.2±0.01 bursts/min; burst duration=154±127 msec; fractional time spent seizing=0.03±0.02%; p=0.001 for all comparisons, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with a Dunn's pairwise multiple comparison test). Scale bars: large trace 0.5 mV, 10 s; inset 0.5 mV, 100 msec.

FIGS. 7A-7D: Confirmation of clemizole activity in scn1Laa mutants. (FIG. 7A) Representative 10 min recording epochs obtained in the forebrain of paralyzed, immobilized and agar-embedded scn1Laa mutant larvae at 6 dpf. Note the presence of small and large amplitude spontaneous burst discharge. (FIG. 7B) Locomotion tracking plots for 10 individual mutant and wild-type sibling larvae. Plots show swim velocity and locomotion tracks with darker colors indicative of higher velocities; 10 min trials are shown. Seizures were scored on a staging system described in Baraban et al. (Neuroscience 2005). S0, little or no swim activity; 51, increased locomotion; S2 whirlpool like swim activity and S3; full body convulsions with rapid swimming events and loss of posture. (FIG. 7C) Box plot of mean velocity (in mm/sec) for 96 zebrafish with fish sorted into putative scn1Laa and sibling control pools based on seizure stages described above. The experiments were performed by first placing the mutant larvae in embryo media and obtaining a baseline locomotion response, embryo media was then replaced with new embryo media and a second locomotion response was obtained. The percent change in velocity from baseline (recording #1) vs. experimental (recording #2) is shown. In the boxplot, the bottom and top of the box represent the 25th percentile and the 75th percentile, respectively. The line across the box represents the median value, and the vertical lines encompass the entire range of values. Plots are shown for all 96 fish (left), putative scn1Laa zebrafish (middle) and sibling controls (left). Subsequent PCR analysis was done to confirm mutant and control pools. (FIG. 7D) Plot of the effect of stiripentol (Stp), diazepam (Dzp), clemizole (Clem) and lamotrigine (Ltg) on locomotor seizure behavior in scn1Laa mutants at 5 dpf. Mean velocity is shown before and after application of a drug. N=7 fish per drug. Bars represent mean±S.E.M. Student's paired t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test with significance set at p=0.01 (*) or p<0.001 (**).

FIG. 8: Antihistamines do not have antiepileptic properties in scn1Lab mutants. Plot of the effect of a variety of antihistamines in the locomotor seizure assay using scn1Lab mutants at 5 dpf. Mean velocity is shown before and after application of a drug. N=7 fish per drug. Additional compounds are listed at right. Bars represent mean±S.E.M. Student's paired t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test with significance set at p=0.01 (*) or p<0.001 (**). Note: some antihistamines increased seizure activity in this assay.

FIGS. 9A-9B: Clemizole concentration-response studies in scn1Lab. Plots from two different concentration-response studies showing the percent inhibition of mean velocity from a baseline value. N=7 fish per concentration and trials were performed on separate clutches of mutant larvae. FIG. 9A: Trial 1; FIG. 9B: Trial 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

“Analog” or “analogue” is used in accordance with its plain ordinary meaning within Chemistry and Biology and refers to a chemical compound that is structurally similar to another compound (i.e., a so-called “reference” compound) but differs in composition, e.g., in the replacement of one atom by an atom of a different element, or in the presence of a particular functional group, or the replacement of one functional group by another functional group, or the absolute stereochemistry of one or more chiral centers of the reference compound. Accordingly, an analog is a compound that is similar or comparable in function and appearance but not in structure or origin to a reference compound.

“Clemizole” refers to a compound having formula:

Clemizole includes pharmaceutically acceptable salts and formulations of clemizole as described herein (e.g. a “clemizole salt”). Exemplary, clemizole salts include but are not limited to clemizole-HCl, clemizolpenicillin, clemizole-sulfate, or clemizole-undecylate.

A “clemizole analog” as set forth herein refers to compounds of similar structure. Such compounds include, for example, those compounds set forth in PCT/US2008/076804, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,322, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. Further exemplary clemizole analogs are set forth, for example in: US 2012/0232062; PCT Pub. Nos. 2009/038248; US 2010/107739; US 2010/107742, WO 2002/089731. WO 2005/032329, WO 2009/039248, WO 2010/039195, WO 2010/107739, and WO 2010/107742, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Clemizole analogs described herein (including the compounds described in the references above) may be substituted (i.e. modified) at the 1 or 2 position as set forth below in formula (I) (boxes Y and Z). Clemizole analogs may be substituted (i.e. modified) at 4, 5, 6, or 7 positions as indicated by box X in formula (I).

Clemizole analogs described herein include, but are not limited to, the following compounds:

and pharmaceutically acceptable salts and formulations thereof.

The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” is meant to include salts of the active compounds that are prepared with relatively nontoxic acids or bases, depending on the particular substituents found on the compounds described herein. When clemizole or a clemizole analog contains relatively acidic functionalities, base addition salts can be obtained by contacting the neutral form of such compounds with a sufficient amount of the desired base, either neat or in a suitable inert solvent. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts include sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium, organic amino, or magnesium salt, or a similar salt. When clemizole or a clemizole analog contain relatively basic functionalities, acid addition salts can be obtained by contacting the neutral form of such compounds with a sufficient amount of the desired acid, either neat or in a suitable inert solvent. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts include those derived from inorganic acids like hydrochloric, hydrobromic, nitric, carbonic, monohydrogencarbonic, phosphoric, monohydrogenphosphoric, dihydrogenphosphoric, sulfuric, monohydrogensulfuric, hydriodic, or phosphorous acids and the like, as well as the salts derived from relatively nontoxic organic acids like acetic, propionic, isobutyric, maleic, malonic, benzoic, succinic, suberic, fumaric, lactic, mandelic, phthalic, benzenesulfonic, p-tolylsulfonic, citric, tartaric, oxalic, methanesulfonic, and the like. Also included are salts of amino acids such as arginate and the like, and salts of organic acids like glucuronic or galactunoric acids and the like (see, for example, Berge et al., “Pharmaceutical Salts”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 1977, 66, 1-19). Clemizole or a clemizole analog may contain both basic and acidic functionalities that allow conversion into either base or acid addition salts.

Thus, clemizole or a clemizole analog may exist as salts, such as with pharmaceutically acceptable acids. The present invention includes such salts. Non-limiting examples of such salts include hydrochlorides, hydrobromides, phosphates, sulfates, methanesulfonates, nitrates, maleates, acetates, citrates, fumarates, proprionates, tartrates (e.g., (+)-tartrates, (−)-tartrates, or mixtures thereof including racemic mixtures), succinates, benzoates, and salts with amino acids such as glutamic acid, and quaternary ammonium salts (e.g. methyl iodide, ethyl iodide, and the like). These salts may be prepared by methods known to those skilled in the art.

The neutral forms of clemizole or a clemizole analog are preferably regenerated by contacting the salt with a base or acid and isolating the parent compound in the conventional manner. The parent form of the compound may differ from the various salt forms in certain physical properties, such as solubility in polar solvents.

In addition to salt forms, clemizole or a clemizole analog may be provided in a prodrug form. Prodrugs of clemizole or a clemizole analog are those compounds that readily undergo chemical changes under physiological conditions to provide the compounds of the present invention. Prodrugs of clemizole or a clemizole analog may be converted in vivo after administration. Additionally, prodrugs of clemizole or a clemizole analog can be converted to active compounds by chemical or biochemical methods in an ex vivo environment, such as, for example, when contacted with a suitable enzyme or chemical reagent.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog can exist in unsolvated forms as well as solvated forms, including hydrated forms. In general, the solvated forms are equivalent to unsolvated forms and are encompassed within the scope of the present invention. Clemizole or a clemizole analog may exist in multiple crystalline or amorphous forms. In general, all physical forms are equivalent for the uses contemplated by the present invention and are intended to be within the scope of the present invention.

An “effective amount” is an amount sufficient for clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) to accomplish a stated purpose relative to the absence of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) (e.g. achieve the effect for which it is administered, treat a disease, reduce protein/enzyme activity, increase protein/enzyme activity, reduce a signaling pathway, or reduce one or more symptoms of a disease or condition). An example of an “effective amount” is an amount of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) sufficient to contribute to the treatment, prevention, or reduction of a symptom or symptoms of a disease, which could also be referred to as a “therapeutically effective amount.” A “reduction” of a symptom or symptoms (and grammatical equivalents of this phrase) means decreasing of the severity or frequency of the symptom(s), or elimination of the symptom(s) (e.g. seizures). A “prophylactically effective amount” of a drug is an amount of a drug that, when administered to a subject, will have the intended prophylactic effect, e.g., preventing or delaying the onset (or reoccurrence) of an injury, disease, pathology or condition, or reducing the likelihood of the onset (or reoccurrence) of an injury, disease, pathology, or condition, or their symptoms (e.g. seizures). The full prophylactic effect does not necessarily occur by administration of one dose, and may occur only after administration of a series of doses. Thus, a prophylactically effective amount may be administered in one or more administrations. The exact amounts will depend on the purpose of the treatment, and will be ascertainable by one skilled in the art using known techniques (see, e.g., Lieberman, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms (vols. 1-3, 1992); Lloyd, The Art, Science and Technology of Pharmaceutical Compounding (1999); Pickar, Dosage Calculations (1999); and Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 20th Edition, 2003, Gennaro, Ed., Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins).

The therapeutically effective amount of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can be initially determined from cell culture assays. Target concentrations will be those concentrations of active compound(s) that are capable of achieving the methods described herein, as measured using the methods described herein or known in the art.

As is well known in the art, therapeutically effective amounts for use in humans can also be determined from animal models. For example, a dose for humans can be formulated to achieve a concentration that has been found to be effective in animals. The dosage in humans can be adjusted by monitoring compounds effectiveness and adjusting the dosage upwards or downwards, as described above. Adjusting the dose to achieve maximal efficacy in humans based on the methods described above and other methods is well within the capabilities of the ordinarily skilled artisan.

Dosages may be varied depending upon the requirements of the patient and the compound being employed. The dose administered to a patient, in the context of the present invention should be sufficient to effect a beneficial therapeutic response in the patient over time. The size of the dose also will be determined by the existence, nature, and extent of any adverse side-effects. Determination of the proper dosage for a particular situation is within the skill of the practitioner. Generally, treatment is initiated with smaller dosages which are less than the optimum dose of the compound. Thereafter, the dosage is increased by small increments until the optimum effect under circumstances is reached.

Dosage amounts and intervals can be adjusted individually to provide levels of the administered compound effective for the particular clinical indication being treated. This will provide a therapeutic regimen that is commensurate with the severity of the individual's disease state.

Utilizing the teachings provided herein, an effective prophylactic or therapeutic treatment regimen can be planned that does not cause substantial toxicity and yet is effective to treat the clinical symptoms demonstrated by the particular patient. This planning should involve the careful choice of active compound by considering factors such as compound potency, relative bioavailability, patient body weight, presence and severity of adverse side effects, preferred mode of administration and the toxicity profile of the selected agent.

“Control” or “control experiment” is used in accordance with its plain ordinary meaning and refers to an experiment in which the subjects or reagents of the experiment are treated as in a parallel experiment except for omission of a procedure, reagent, or variable of the experiment. In some instances, the control is used as a standard of comparison in evaluating experimental effects. In some embodiments, a control is the measurement of the activity of a protein in the absence of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof).

A “test compound” as used herein refers to an experimental compound used in a screening process to identify activity, non-activity, or other modulation of a particularized biological target or pathway. A test compound may be a clemizole analog described herein, including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

The term “modulation”, “modulate”, or “modulator” are used in accordance with their plain ordinary meaning and refer to the act of changing or varying one or more properties. “Modulator” refers to a composition that increases or decreases the level of a target molecule or the function of a target molecule or the physical state of the target of the molecule. “Modulation” refers to the process of changing or varying one or more properties. For example, as applied to the effects of a modulator on a biological target, to modulate means to change by increasing or decreasing a property or function of the biological target or the amount of the biological target.

As defined herein, the term “inhibition”, “inhibit”, “inhibiting” and the like in reference to a protein-inhibitor interaction means negatively affecting (e.g. decreasing) the activity or function of the protein relative to the activity or function of the protein in the absence of the inhibitor. In some embodiments inhibition refers to reduction of a disease or symptoms of disease. In some embodiments, inhibition refers to a reduction in the activity of a particular protein or nucleic acid target. Thus, inhibition includes, at least in part, partially or totally blocking stimulation, decreasing, preventing, or delaying activation, or inactivating, desensitizing, or down-regulating signal transduction or protein/enzymatic activity or the amount of a protein. Inhibition as used herein may refer to inhibition of a voltage-gated sodium channel.

The term “activation” or “activating” and the like refer to protein-compound interactions that positively affect (e.g. increase) the activity or function of the protein relative to the activity or function of the protein in absence of the activator. Activation may refer to enhanced activity of a particular protein target. Activation may refer to restoration of loss-of-function of a mutated protein target. Activation as used herein may refer to activation of a voltage-gated sodium channel.

“Contacting” is used in accordance with its plain ordinary meaning and refers to the process of allowing at least two distinct species (e.g. chemical compounds including biomolecules or cells) to become sufficiently proximal to react, interact or physically touch. It should be appreciated; however, the resulting reaction product can be produced directly from a reaction between the added reagents or from an intermediate from one or more of the added reagents that can be produced in the reaction mixture.

The term “contacting” may include allowing two species to react, interact, or physically touch, wherein the two species may be a compound as described herein and a protein or enzyme. In some embodiments contacting includes allowing a compound described herein to interact with a protein or enzyme that is involved in a signaling pathway.

The term “associated” or “associated with” in the context of a substance or substance activity or function associated with a disease means that the disease is caused by (in whole or in part), or a symptom of the disease is caused by (in whole or in part) the substance or substance activity or function.

“Patient” or “subject in need thereof” refers to a living organism suffering from or prone to a disease or condition that can be treated by administration of a pharmaceutical composition as provided herein. Non-limiting examples include humans, other mammals, bovines, rats, mice, dogs, monkeys, goat, sheep, cows, deer, and other non-mammalian animals such as zebrafish. A patient may be human.

“Disease” or “condition” refer to a state of being or health status of a patient or subject capable of being treated with the compounds or methods provided herein.

The terms “epileptic disorder,” “epilepsy disorder,” “seizure disorder,” or “epilepsy” herein refer to a spectrum of chronic neurological disorders most often characterized by the presence of unprovoked seizures. See e.g. Noebels et. al., Jasper's Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies, 4th edition, Bethesda (Md.): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2012. Epilepsy as used herein, may refer to injury to the brain (e.g. from trauma, stroke, or cancer) or genetic mutation. The symptoms of epilepsy disorders may result from abnormal electrochemical signaling between neurons in the brain. Patients experiencing two or more unprovoked seizures may be considered to have epilepsy.

Types of epilepsy disorders include, for example, benign Rolandic epilepsy, frontal lobe epilepsy, infantile spasms, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), juvenile absence epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy (e.g. pyknolepsy), febrile seizures, progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Lafora, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, Dravet syndrome (DS), Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures (GEFS+), Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy (SMEI), Benign Neonatal Familial Convulsions (BFNC), West Syndrome, Ohtahara Syndrome, early myoclonic encephalopathies, migrating partial epilepsy, infantile epileptic encephalopathies, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), focal cortical dysplasia, Type I Lissencephaly, Miller-Dieker Syndrome, Angelman's syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, epilepsy in autism spectrum disorders, subcortical band heterotopia, Walker-Warburg syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, posttraumatic epilepsy, progressive myoclonus epilepsies, reflex epilepsy, Rasmussen's syndrome, temporal lobe epilepsy, limbic epilepsy, status epilepticus, abdominal epilepsy, massive bilateral myoclonus, catamenial epilepsy, Jacksonian seizure disorder, Unverricht-Lundborg disease, or photosensitive epilepsy.

“Pharmaceutically acceptable excipient” and “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or “carrier moiety” refer to a substance that aids the administration of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) to and absorption by a subject and can be included in the compositions without causing a significant adverse toxicological effect on the patient. Non-limiting examples of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients include water, NaCl, normal saline solutions, lactated Ringer's, normal sucrose, normal glucose, binders, fillers, disintegrants, lubricants, coatings, sweeteners, flavors, salt solutions (such as Ringer's solution), alcohols, oils, gelatins, carbohydrates such as lactose, amylose or starch, fatty acid esters, hydroxymethycellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidine, and colors, and the like. Such preparations can be sterilized and, if desired, mixed with auxiliary agents such as lubricants, preservatives, stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, salts for influencing osmotic pressure, buffers, coloring, and/or aromatic substances and the like that do not deleteriously react with the compounds of the invention. One of skill in the art will recognize that other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are useful in the present invention.

The term “preparation” is intended to include the formulation of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) with encapsulating material as a carrier providing a capsule in which the active component with or without other carriers, is surrounded by a carrier, which is thus in association with it. Similarly, cachets and lozenges are included. Tablets, powders, capsules, pills, cachets, and lozenges can be used as solid dosage forms suitable for oral administration.

As used herein, the term “administering” means oral administration, administration as a suppository, topical contact, intravenous, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intralesional, intrathecal, intranasal or subcutaneous administration, or the implantation of a slow-release device, e.g., a mini-osmotic pump, to a subject. Administration is by any route, including parenteral and transmucosal (e.g., buccal, sublingual, palatal, gingival, nasal, vaginal, rectal, or transdermal). Parenteral administration includes, e.g., intravenous, intramuscular, intra-arteriole, intradermal, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intraventricular, and intracranial. Other modes of delivery include, but are not limited to, the use of liposomal formulations, intravenous infusion, transdermal patches, etc.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) and pharmaceutical compositions thereof can be delivered transdermally, by a topical route, formulated as applicator sticks, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, gels, creams, ointments, pastes, jellies, paints, powders, and aerosols. Oral preparations include tablets, pills, powder, dragees, capsules, liquids, lozenges, cachets, gels, syrups, slurries, suspensions, etc., suitable for ingestion by the patient. Solid form preparations include powders, tablets, pills, capsules, cachets, suppositories, and dispersible granules. Liquid form preparations include solutions, suspensions, and emulsions, for example, water or water/propylene glycol solutions. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may additionally include components to provide sustained release and/or comfort. Such components include high molecular weight, anionic mucomimetic polymers, gelling polysaccharides and finely-divided drug carrier substrates. These components are discussed in greater detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,911,920; 5,403,841; 5,212,162; and 4,861,760. The entire contents of these patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can also be delivered as microspheres for slow release in the body. For example, microspheres can be administered via intradermal injection of drug-containing microspheres, which slowly release subcutaneously (see Rao, J. Biomater Sci. Polym. Ed. 7:623-645, 1995; as biodegradable and injectable gel formulations (see, e.g., Gao Pharm. Res. 12:857-863, 1995); or, as microspheres for oral administration (see, e.g., Eyles, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 49:669-674, 1997). The formulations of the compositions of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can be delivered by the use of liposomes which fuse with the cellular membrane or are endocytosed, i.e., by employing receptor ligands attached to the liposome, that bind to surface membrane protein receptors of the cell resulting in endocytosis. By using liposomes, particularly where the liposome surface carries receptor ligands specific for target cells, or are otherwise preferentially directed to a specific organ, one can focus the delivery of the compositions of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) into the target cells in vivo. (See, e.g., Al-Muhammed, J. Microencapsul. 13:293-306, 1996; Chonn, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6:698-708, 1995; Ostro, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 46:1576-1587, 1989). The compositions can also be delivered as nanoparticles.

By “co-administer” it is meant that a composition described herein is administered at the same time, just prior to, or just after the administration of one or more additional therapies. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can be administered alone or can be co-administered to the patient. Co-administration is meant to include simultaneous or sequential administration of the compounds individually or in combination (more than one compound). Thus, the preparations can also be combined, when desired, with other active substances (e.g. to reduce metabolic degradation). Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can be delivered transdermally, by a topical route, or formulated as applicator sticks, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, gels, creams, ointments, pastes, jellies, paints, powders, and aerosols.

The terms “add on therapy,” “add-on therapy,” “adjunct therapy,” and “adjunctive therapy” are used interchangeably herein and refer to combining clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof with another anticonvulsant to treat epilepsy.

An “anti-seizure drug”, “anti-epilepsy drug”, “AED” or “anticonvulsant” are used interchangeably herein and according to their common and ordinary meaning and include compositions for reducing or eliminating seizures. Anticonvulsants include, but are not limited to acetazolamide, benzodiazepine, cannabadiols, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, ethotoin, felbamate, fenfluramine, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, ganaxolone, huperzine A, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, nitrazepam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, potassium bromide, pregabalin, primidone, retigabine, rufinamide, sodium valproate, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or zonisamide.

I. Methods of Treatment

Provided herein are methods of treating an epilepsy disorder. In one aspect, the method is a method of treating an epilepsy disorder by administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another aspect, the method is a method of treating an epilepsy disorder by administering to a subject in need thereof, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein, where the pharmaceutical composition includes clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The analog of clemizole may include compounds of similar structure as set forth, in for example, PCT/US2008/076804, WO10107739, WO2009039248, or U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,322, which are incorporated herein by reference. The pharmaceutically acceptable salt may be clemizole HCl. The subject may have (e.g. may eat food in accordance with) a ketogenic diet. The subject may be a child (e.g. a subject having a pediatric epilepsy condition). Clemizole analogs used in the methods described herein include, but are not limited to, the following compounds:

and pharmaceutically acceptable salts and formulations thereof.

The epilepsy disorder may be benign Rolandic epilepsy, frontal lobe epilepsy, infantile spasms, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), juvenile absence epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy (e.g. pyknolepsy), febrile seizures, progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Lafora, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, Dravet syndrome, Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures (GEFS+), Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy (SMEI), Benign Neonatal Familial Convulsions (BFNC), West Syndrome, Ohtahara Syndrome, early myoclonic encephalopathies, migrating partial epilepsy, infantile epileptic encephalopathies, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), focal cortical dysplasia, Type I Lissencephaly, Miller-Dieker Syndrome, Angelman's syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, epilepsy in autism spectrum disorders, subcortical band heterotopia, Walker-Warburg syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, posttraumatic epilepsy, progressive myoclonus epilepsies, reflex epilepsy, Rasmussen's syndrome, temporal lobe epilepsy, limbic epilepsy, status epilepticus, abdominal epilepsy, massive bilateral myoclonus, catamenial epilepsy, Jacksonian seizure disorder, Unverricht-Lundborg disease, or photosensitive epilepsy. The epilepsy may include generalized seizures or partial (i.e. focal) seizures.

The epilepsy disorder may be Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, infantile spasm, or Ohtahara Syndrome. The epilepsy disorder may be Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, infantile spasm, or Ohtahara Syndrome, or a pediatric epilepsy disorder. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be benign childhood epilepsy, Benign Neonatal Familial Convulsions (BFNC), febrile seizures, Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, infantile spasm, Ohtahara Syndrome, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, childhood absence epilepsy (e.g. pyknolepsy), infantile spasms. The epilepsy disorder may be Dravet Syndrome.

The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be benign childhood epilepsy. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be Benign Neonatal Familial Convulsions (BFNC). The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be febrile seizures. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be Dravet Syndrome. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be infantile spasm. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be Ohtahara Syndrome. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be juvenile absence epilepsy. The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be childhood absence epilepsy (e.g. pyknolepsy). The pediatric epilepsy disorder may be infantile spasms.

The epilepsy disorder may be a result of a neurological disease or injury such as, for example, encephalitis, cerebritis, abscess, stroke, tumor, trauma, genetic, tuberous sclerosis, cerebral dysgenesis, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalophathy. The epilepsy disorder may be associated with a neurodegenerative disease such as, for example, Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's Disease. The epilepsy disorder may be associated with autism. The epilepsy disorder may be associated with a single gene mutation. The epilepsy disease may be associated with compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures. The administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may inhibit compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in a epilepsy disorder, in an Alzheimer's disease subject (e.g. a subject suffering from Alzheimer's disease), in an autism subject (e.g. a subject having autism), or in a Parkinson's disease subject (e.g. a subject suffering from Parkinson's disease). Thus, clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may inhibit compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in a epilepsy disorder. Clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may inhibit compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in an Alzheimer's disease subject. Clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may inhibit compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in an autism subject. Clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may inhibit compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in a Parkinson's disease subject.

The administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may reduce the incidence (e.g. number of occurrences) of unprovoked seizures in the subject compared to the absence of clemizole, the clemizole analog, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Thus, a patient's response to the administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, may be monitored progressively compared to a time before the administration of compounds described herein (e.g. a control or control time).

The administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may reduce or prevent myoclonus seizures or status epilepticus in the subject compared to the absence of clemizole, the clemizole analog, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may reduce or prevent myoclonus seizures in the subject compared to the absence of clemizole, the clemizole analog, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof may reduce or prevent status epilepticus in the subject compared to the absence of clemizole, the clemizole analog, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Thus, a patient's response to the administration of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, may be monitored progressively compared to a time before the administration of compounds described herein (e.g. a control or control time).

The epilepsy disorder may be an epilepsy disorder which is non-responsive to treatment with an antiepileptic drug (AED). The subject may eat a ketogenic diet. The epilepsy disorder may be an epilepsy disorder in an adult (e.g. more than about 16 years old).

The epilepsy disorder may be an epilepsy disorder in children. Thus, the epilepsy disorder may be a pediatric epilepsy disorder. The child may be less than about 1 week old. The child may be less than about 1 month old. The child may be less than about 6 months old. The child may be less than about 12 months old. The child may be less than about 2 years old. The child may be less than about 3 years old. The child may be less than about 4 years old. The child may be less than about 5 years old. The child may be less than about 6 years old. The child may be less than about 7 years old. The child may be less than about 8 years old. The child may be less than about 9 years old. The child may be less than about 10 years old. The child may be less than about 12 years old.

The child may be more than about 1 week old. The child may be more than about 1 month old. The child may be more than about 6 months old. The child may be more than about 12 months old. The child may be more than about 2 years old. The child may be more than about 3 years old. The child may be more than about 4 years old. The child may be more than about 5 years old. The child may be more than about 5 years old. The child may be more than about 6 years old. The child may be more than about 7 years old. The child may be more than about 8 years old. The child may be more than about 9 years old. The child may be more than about 10 years old. The child may be more than about 11 years old. The child may be more than about 12 years old.

The child may have an epilepsy disorder treated by administering an AED as described herein. Thus, clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof may be administered to such a child (e.g. as an add-on therapy).

In another aspect, is a method of treating Dravet Syndrome. The method of treating Dravet Syndrome includes administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The method of treating Dravet Syndrome may include administering to a subject in need thereof, a pharmaceutical composition of clemizole, a clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof as described herein. The analog of clemizole may include compounds of formula (I) described herein and may include compounds of similar structure as set forth, in for example, PCT/US2008/076804, WO10107739, WO2009039248, or U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,322, which are incorporated herein by reference. Clemizole, or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be co-administered to a subject in need thereof with an AED as described herein.

In the methods described herein, clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be co-administered with an anti-epileptic drug (AED). The AED may be acetazolamide, benzodiazepine, cannabadiols, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, ethotoin, felbamate, fenfluramine, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, ganaxolone, huperzine A, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, nitrazepam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, potassium bromide, pregabalin, primidone, retigabine, rufinamide, sodium valproate, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or zonisamide. The AED may be valproic acid, valproate, clonazepam, ethosuximide, felbamate, gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, benzodiazepine, phenobarbital, pregabalin, primidone, tiagabine, topiramate, potassium bromide, phenytoin, stiripentol, vigabatrin, or zonisamide. The AED may be valproic acid, valproate, Gabapentin, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or vigabatrin.

The AED may be acetazolamide. The AED may be benzodiazepine. The AED may be cannabadiols. The AED may be carbamazepine. The AED may be clobazam. The AED may be clonazepam. The AED may be eslicarbazepine acetate. The AED may be ethosuximide. The AED may be ethotoin. The AED may be felbamate. The AED may be fenfluramine. The AED may be fosphenytoin. The AED may be gabapentin. The AED may be ganaxolone. The AED may be huperzine A. The AED may be lacosamide. The AED may be lamotrigine. The AED may be levetiracetam. The AED may be nitrazepam. The AED may be oxcarbazepine. The AED may be perampanel. The AED may be piracetam. The AED may be phenobarbital. The AED may be phenytoin. The AED may be potassium bromide. The AED may be pregabalin. The AED may be primidone. The AED may be retigabine. The AED may be rufinamide. The AED may be sodium valproate. The AED may be stiripentol. The AED may be tiagabine. The AED may be topiramate. The AED may be vigabatrin. The AED may be zonisamide. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition of clemizole or a clemizole analog may be administered as an adjunctive therapy to one or more of the AEDs described herein.

Clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof may thus be administered as an add-on (e.g. in combination with) AED medications for treating seizures, including seizures associated with the epilepsy disorders described herein. Clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof may be administered as an adjunctive therapy (e.g. in combination with) AED medications for treating seizures, including seizures associated with the epilepsy disorders described herein.

The epilepsy disorder may be characterized by partial seizures or generalized seizures. The epilepsy disorder may be characterized by partial seizures. The epilepsy disorder may be characterized by generalized seizures. The partial seizure may be a simple focal seizure, a complex focal seizure, or a partial focal seizure with secondary generalization. The generalized seizure may be a generalized tonic-clonic seizure, an absence seizure (i.e. petit mal), a myoclonic seizure, a clonic seizure, a tonic seizure, or a atonic seizure.

When co-administered with the AEDs described herein, clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered simultaneously. When administered simultaneously, clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be formulated together with the AED (i.e. in a single dosage unit). Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be formulated for separate administration from the AED but administered at the same time. When co-administered with AEDs described herein, clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered sequentially (e.g. before or after) the administration of the AED. As set forth herein, one skilled in the art could readily determine the sequential order of administration.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 1 mg/kg to about 1000 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 10 mg/kg to about 1000 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 500 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 400 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 350 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 300 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 250 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 200 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 100 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 75 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg to about 50 mg/kg. As used herein “mg/kg” refers to mg per kg body weight of the subject. Dosages described herein include administration of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) as a single therapeutic active agent or administration of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) as a therapeutic active agent in combination (as described herein) with an AED described herein.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 1 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 5 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 10 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 20 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 25 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 30 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 40 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 50 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 75 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 100 mg/kg.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 125 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 150 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 175 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 200 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 225 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 250 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 275 mg/kg.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 300 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 325 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 350 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 375 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 400 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 425 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 450 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 475 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 500 mg/kg.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 600 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 700 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 800 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 900 mg/kg. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at a dose of about 1000 mg/kg.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered in the dosages described herein at least once a day (e.g. once every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 hours). Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered daily in the dosages described herein. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at least twice a week in the dosages described herein. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered at least three times a week as described herein. Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered monthly as described herein.

II. Pharmaceutical Compositions

Provided herein are pharmaceutical compositions for treating an epilepsy disease described herein. In one aspect, is a pharmaceutical composition that includes clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Clemizole analogs used in the pharmaceutical compositions described herein include, but are not limited to, the following compounds:

and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

The pharmaceutical composition may also include a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. The pharmaceutically acceptable salt of clemizole in the pharmaceutical composition may be clemizole HCl. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated as a tablet, a powder, a capsule, a pill, a cachet, or a lozenge as described herein. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated as a tablet, capsule, pill, cachet, or lozenge for oral administration. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated for dissolution into a solution for administration by such techniques as, for example, intravenous administration. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated for oral administration, suppository administration, topical administration, intravenous administration, intraperitoneal administration, intramuscular administration, intralesional administration, intrathecal administration, intranasal administration, subcutaneous administration, implantation, transdermal administration, or transmucosal administration as described herein.

When administered as pharmaceutical composition, the pharmaceutical compositions may include optical isomers, diastereomers, enantiomers, isoforms, polymorphs, hydrates, solvates or products, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts of clemizole or a clemizole analog described herein (e.g. agents, modulators, inhibitors, antagonists). Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) included in the pharmaceutical composition may be covalently attached to a carrier moiety, as described above. Alternatively, clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) included in the pharmaceutical composition is not covalently linked to a carrier moiety.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) may be administered alone or co-administered to a subject in need thereof with an AED as described herein. Pharmaceutical compositions of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof). Co-administration is meant to include simultaneous or sequential administration as described herein of clemizole or a clemizole analog individually or in combination (e.g. more than one compound—e.g. an AED described herein). The preparations can also be combined, when desired, with other active substances (e.g. to prevent seizures).

1. Formulations

Clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition described herein can be prepared and administered in a wide variety of oral, parenteral, and topical dosage forms. Clemizole analogs used in the formulations described herein include, but are not limited to, the following compounds:

and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

Thus, clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition described herein can be administered by injection (e.g. intravenously, intramuscularly, intracutaneously, subcutaneously, intraduodenally, or intraperitoneally). Also, clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition described herein can be administered by inhalation, for example, intranasally. Additionally, clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition can be administered transdermally. It is also envisioned that multiple routes of administration (e.g., intramuscular, oral, transdermal) can be used to administer clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition. The pharmaceutical compositions described herein may include a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient and one or more of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof). The pharmaceutical compositions described herein may include a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient, one or more of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) and an one or more AED as described herein.

Preparation may include pharmaceutically acceptable carriers. The pharmaceutically acceptable carriers can be either solid or liquid. Solid form preparations include powders, tablets, pills, capsules, cachets, suppositories, and dispersible granules. A solid carrier may be one or more substance that may also act as diluents, flavoring agents, binders, preservatives, tablet disintegrating agents, or an encapsulating material.

In powders, the carrier may be a finely divided solid in a mixture with the finely divided active component. In tablets, the active component may be mixed with the carrier having the necessary binding properties in suitable proportions and compacted in the shape and size desired.

The powders and tablets preferably contain from 5% to 70% of the active compound. Suitable carriers are magnesium carbonate, magnesium stearate, talc, sugar, lactose, pectin, dextrin, starch, gelatin, tragacanth, methylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, a low melting wax, cocoa butter, and the like. The term “preparation” is intended to include the formulation of the active compound with encapsulating material as a carrier providing a capsule in which the active component with or without other carriers, is surrounded by a carrier, which is thus in association with it. Similarly, cachets and lozenges are included. Tablets, powders, capsules, pills, cachets, and lozenges can be used as solid dosage forms suitable for oral administration.

Suitable solid excipients include, but are not limited to, magnesium carbonate; magnesium stearate; talc; pectin; dextrin; starch; tragacanth; a low melting wax; cocoa butter; carbohydrates; sugars including, but not limited to, lactose, sucrose, mannitol, or sorbitol, starch from corn, wheat, rice, potato, or other plants; cellulose such as methyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose, or sodium carboxymethylcellulose; and gums including arabic and tragacanth; as well as proteins including, but not limited to, gelatin and collagen. If desired, disintegrating or solubilizing agents may be added, such as the cross-linked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, agar, alginic acid, or a salt thereof, such as sodium alginate.

Dragee cores are provided with suitable coatings such as concentrated sugar solutions, which may also contain gum arabic, talc, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carbopol gel, polyethylene glycol, and/or titanium dioxide, lacquer solutions, and suitable organic solvents or solvent mixtures. Dyestuffs or pigments may be added to the tablets or dragee coatings for product identification or to characterize the quantity of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition (i.e., dosage). Pharmaceutical preparations described herein can also be used orally using, for example, push-fit capsules made of gelatin, as well as soft, sealed capsules made of gelatin and a coating such as glycerol or sorbitol.

For preparing suppositories, a low melting wax, such as a mixture of fatty acid glycerides or cocoa butter, is first melted and the active component is dispersed homogeneously therein, as by stirring. The molten homogeneous mixture is then poured into convenient sized molds, allowed to cool, and thereby to solidify.

Liquid form preparations include solutions, suspensions, and emulsions, for example, water or water/propylene glycol solutions. For parenteral injection, liquid preparations can be formulated in solution in aqueous polyethylene glycol solution.

When parenteral application is needed or desired, particularly suitable admixtures for clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition are injectable, sterile solutions, preferably oily or aqueous solutions, as well as suspensions, emulsions, or implants, including suppositories. In particular, carriers for parenteral administration include aqueous solutions of dextrose, saline, pure water, ethanol, glycerol, propylene glycol, peanut oil, sesame oil, polyoxyethylene-block polymers, and the like. Ampoules are convenient unit dosages. Clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition can also be incorporated into liposomes or administered via transdermal pumps or patches. Pharmaceutical admixtures suitable for use herein include those described, for example, in Pharmaceutical Sciences (17th Ed., Mack Pub. Co., Easton, Pa.) and WO 96/05309, the teachings of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

Aqueous solutions suitable for oral use can be prepared by dissolving the active component in water and adding suitable colorants, flavors, stabilizers, and thickening agents as desired. Aqueous suspensions suitable for oral use can be made by dispersing the finely divided active component in water with viscous material, such as natural or synthetic gums, resins, methylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, sodium alginate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gum tragacanth and gum acacia, and dispersing or wetting agents such as a naturally occurring phosphatide (e.g., lecithin), a condensation product of an alkylene oxide with a fatty acid (e.g., polyoxyethylene stearate), a condensation product of ethylene oxide with a long chain aliphatic alcohol (e.g., heptadecaethylene oxycetanol), a condensation product of ethylene oxide with a partial ester derived from a fatty acid and a hexitol (e.g., polyoxyethylene sorbitol mono-oleate), or a condensation product of ethylene oxide with a partial ester derived from fatty acid and a hexitol anhydride (e.g., polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono-oleate). The aqueous suspension can also contain one or more preservatives such as ethyl or n-propyl p-hydroxybenzoate, one or more coloring agents, one or more flavoring agents and one or more sweetening agents, such as sucrose, aspartame or saccharin. Formulations can be adjusted for osmolarity.

Also included herein are solid form preparations that are intended to be converted, shortly before use, to liquid form preparations for oral administration. Such liquid forms include solutions, suspensions, and emulsions. These preparations may contain, in addition to the active component, colorants, flavors, stabilizers, buffers, artificial and natural sweeteners, dispersants, thickeners, solubilizing agents, and the like.

Oil suspensions can contain a thickening agent, such as beeswax, hard paraffin or cetyl alcohol. Sweetening agents can be added to provide a palatable oral preparation, such as glycerol, sorbitol or sucrose. These formulations can be preserved by the addition of an antioxidant such as ascorbic acid. As an example of an injectable oil vehicle, see Minto, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 281:93-102, 1997. The pharmaceutical formulations described herein can also be in the form of oil-in-water emulsions. The oily phase can be a vegetable oil or a mineral oil, described above, or a mixture of these. Suitable emulsifying agents include naturally-occurring gums, such as gum acacia and gum tragacanth, naturally occurring phosphatides, such as soybean lecithin, esters or partial esters derived from fatty acids and hexitol anhydrides, such as sorbitan mono-oleate, and condensation products of these partial esters with ethylene oxide, such as polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono-oleate. The emulsion can also contain sweetening agents and flavoring agents, as in the formulation of syrups and elixirs. Such formulations can also contain a demulcent, a preservative, or a coloring agent.

The pharmaceutical preparation is preferably in unit dosage form. In such form the preparation is subdivided into unit doses containing appropriate quantities of the active component. The unit dosage form can be a packaged preparation, the package containing discrete quantities of preparation, such as packeted tablets, capsules, and powders in vials or ampoules. Also, the unit dosage form can be a capsule, tablet, cachet, or lozenge itself, or it can be the appropriate number of any of these in packaged form.

The quantity of active component in a unit dose preparation may be varied or adjusted from 0.1 mg to 10000 mg according to the particular application and the potency of the active component. The composition can, if desired, also contain other compatible therapeutic agents.

Formulations may include a surfactant or other appropriate co-solvent in the composition. Such co-solvents include: Polysorbate 20, 60, and 80; PLURONIC® F-68, F-84, and P-103; cyclodextrin; and polyoxyl 35 castor oil. Such co-solvents are typically employed at a level between about 0.01% and about 2% by weight. Viscosity greater than that of simple aqueous solutions may be desirable to decrease variability in dispensing the formulations, to decrease physical separation of components of a suspension or emulsion of formulation, and/or otherwise to improve the formulation. Such viscosity-building agents include, for example, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, methyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose, chondroitin sulfate and salts thereof, hyaluronic acid and salts thereof, and combinations of the foregoing. Such agents are typically employed at a level between about 0.01% and about 2% by weight.

Viscosity greater than that of simple aqueous solutions may be desirable to decrease variability in dispensing the formulations, to decrease physical separation of components of a suspension or emulsion of formulation and/or otherwise to improve the formulation. Such viscosity building agents include, for example, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, methyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose, chondroitin sulfate and salts thereof, hyaluronic acid and salts thereof, combinations of the foregoing, and other agents known to those skilled in the art. Such agents are typically employed at a level between about 0.01% and about 2% by weight. Determination of acceptable amounts of any of the above adjuvants is readily ascertained by one skilled in the art.

The pharmaceutical compositions may additionally include components to provide sustained release and/or comfort. Such components include high molecular weight, anionic mucomimetic polymers, gelling polysaccharides, and finely-divided drug carrier substrates. These components are discussed in greater detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,911,920; 5,403,841; 5,212,162; and 4,861,760. The entire contents of these patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

The pharmaceutical composition may be intended for intravenous use. The pharmaceutically acceptable excipient can include buffers to adjust the pH to a desirable range for intravenous use. Many buffers including salts of inorganic acids such as phosphate, borate, and sulfate are known.

Clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof can be delivered transdermally, for treating the epilepsy disorders described herein, by a topical route, formulated as applicator sticks, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, gels, creams, ointments, pastes, jellies, paints, powders, and aerosols.

Clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) can be provided as a salt in the pharmaceutical compositions described herein and can be formed with many acids, including but not limited to hydrochloric, sulfuric, acetic, lactic, tartaric, malic, succinic, etc. Salts tend to be more soluble in aqueous or other protonic solvents that are the corresponding free base forms.

Clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof administered for treating epilepsy disorders described herein may be administered via parenteral administration, such as intravenous (IV) administration or administration into a body cavity or lumen of an organ. The formulations for administration will commonly comprise a solution of the compositions of the present invention dissolved in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Among the acceptable vehicles and solvents that can be employed are water and Ringer's solution, an isotonic sodium chloride. In addition, sterile fixed oils can conventionally be employed as a solvent or suspending medium. For this purpose any bland fixed oil can be employed including synthetic mono- or diglycerides. In addition, fatty acids such as oleic acid can likewise be used in the preparation of injectables. These solutions are sterile and generally free of undesirable matter. These formulations may be sterilized by conventional, well known sterilization techniques. The formulations may contain pharmaceutically acceptable auxiliary substances as required to approximate physiological conditions such as pH adjusting and buffering agents, toxicity adjusting agents, e.g., sodium acetate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium lactate and the like. The concentration of the compositions of the present invention in these formulations can vary widely, and will be selected primarily based on fluid volumes, viscosities, body weight, and the like, in accordance with the particular mode of administration selected and the patient's needs. For IV administration, the formulation can be a sterile injectable preparation, such as a sterile injectable aqueous or oleaginous suspension. This suspension can be formulated according to the known art using those suitable dispersing or wetting agents and suspending agents. The sterile injectable preparation can also be a sterile injectable solution or suspension in a nontoxic parenterally-acceptable diluent or solvent, such as a solution of 1,3-butanediol.

The pharmaceutical formulations of clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) for treating an epilepsy disorder can be delivered by the use of liposomes which fuse with the cellular membrane or are endocytosed, i.e., by employing ligands attached to the liposome, or attached directly to the oligonucleotide, that bind to surface membrane protein receptors of the cell resulting in endocytosis. By using liposomes, particularly where the liposome surface carries ligands specific for target cells, or are otherwise preferentially directed to a specific organ, one can focus the delivery of the compositions of the present invention into the target cells in vivo. (See, e.g., Al-Muhammed, J. Microencapsul. 13:293-306, 1996; Chonn, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6:698-708, 1995; Ostro, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 46:1576-1587, 1989).

Co-administration includes administering one active agent (e.g. clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof)) within 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, or 24 hours of a second active agent (e.g. an anticonvulsant). Co-administration may include administering one active agent within 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, or 24 hours of a second active agent. Co-administration may include administering two active agents simultaneously, approximately simultaneously (e.g., within about 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 minutes of each other), or sequentially in any order. Co-administration can be accomplished by co-formulation, i.e., preparing a single pharmaceutical composition including both active agents. In other embodiments, the active agents can be formulated separately. The active and/or adjunctive agents may be linked or conjugated to one another.

Co-administration also includes combination with treatments for epilepsy disorders such as dietary requirements or dietary changes. Accordingly, clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof may be administered to subjects on specialized diets, including but not limited to, a ketogenic diet (e.g. a high-fat, adequate-protein, low-carbohydrate diet).

2. Effective Dosages

The pharmaceutical composition may include clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) contained in a therapeutically effective amount, i.e., in an amount effective to achieve its intended purpose. The actual amount effective for a particular application will depend, inter alia, on the condition being treated. For example, when administered in methods to treat an epilepsy disorder (e.g. Dravet Syndrome), such compositions will contain amounts of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof effective to achieve the desired result (e.g. inhibiting seizures).

The dosage and frequency (single or multiple doses) of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof administered can vary depending upon a variety of factors, including route of administration; size, age, sex, health, body weight, body mass index, and diet of the recipient; nature and extent of symptoms of the disease being treated; presence of other diseases or other health-related problems; kind of concurrent treatment; and complications from any disease or treatment regimen. Other therapeutic regimens or agents can be used in conjunction with the methods described herein.

The therapeutically effective amounts of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof for treating epilepsy diseases described herein may be initially determined from cell culture assays. Target concentrations will be those concentrations of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof capable of inhibiting or otherwise decreasing seizures experienced by a patient.

Therapeutically effective amounts of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof for use in humans may be determined from animal models. For example, a dose for humans can be formulated to achieve a concentration that has been found to be effective in animals. The dosage in humans can be adjusted by monitoring response of the patient to the treatment and adjusting the dosage upwards or downwards, as described above.

Dosages may be varied depending upon the requirements of the subject and the compound being employed. The dose administered to a subject, in the context of the pharmaceutical compositions presented herein, should be sufficient to effect a beneficial therapeutic response in the subject over time. The size of the dose also will be determined by the existence, nature, and extent of any adverse side effects. Generally, treatment is initiated with smaller dosages, which are less than the optimum dose of the compound. Thereafter, the dosage is increased by small increments until the optimum effect under circumstances is reached.

Dosage amounts and intervals can be adjusted individually to provide levels of the administered clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof effective for the particular epilepsy disorder being treated. This will provide a therapeutic regimen that is commensurate with the severity of the individual's disease state.

Utilizing the teachings provided herein, an effective prophylactic or therapeutic treatment regimen can be planned that does not cause substantial toxicity and yet is entirely effective to treat the clinical symptoms demonstrated by the particular patient. This planning should involve the careful choice of clemizole, a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) or a pharmaceutical composition thereof by considering factors such as potency, relative bioavailability, patient body weight, presence and severity of adverse side effects, preferred mode of administration, and the toxicity profile of the selected agent.

3. Toxicity

The ratio between toxicity and therapeutic effect for a particular compound is its therapeutic index and can be expressed as the ratio between LD₅₀ (the amount of compound lethal in 50% of the population) and ED₅₀ (the amount of compound effective in 50% of the population). Compounds that exhibit high therapeutic indices are preferred. Therapeutic index data obtained from cell culture assays and/or animal studies can be used in formulating a range of dosages for use in humans. The dosage of such compounds preferably lies within a range of plasma concentrations that include the ED₅₀ with little or no toxicity. The dosage may vary within this range depending upon the dosage form employed and the route of administration utilized. See, e.g. Fingl et al., In: THE PHARMACOLOGICAL BASIS OF THERAPEUTICS, Ch. 1, p. 1, 1975. The exact formulation, route of administration, and dosage can be chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient's condition and the particular method in which the compound is used.

When parenteral application is needed or desired, particularly suitable admixtures for clemizole or a clemizole analog (including pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof) included in the pharmaceutical composition may be injectable, sterile solutions, oily or aqueous solutions, as well as suspensions, emulsions, or implants, including suppositories. In particular, carriers for parenteral administration include aqueous solutions of dextrose, saline, pure water, ethanol, glycerol, propylene glycol, peanut oil, sesame oil, polyoxyethylene-block polymers, and the like. Ampoules are convenient unit dosages. Pharmaceutical admixtures suitable for use in the pharmaceutical compositions presented herein may include those described, for example, in Pharmaceutical Sciences (17th Ed., Mack Pub. Co., Easton, Pa.) and WO 96/05309, the teachings of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

III. Examples Example 1

Epilepsy can be acquired as a result of an injury to the brain or genetic mutation. Among the genetic epilepsies more than 650 variants have been identified in the SCN1A gene (Harkin, L. A. et al. The spectrum of SCN1A-related infantile epileptic encephalopathies. Brain 130, 843-852 (2007); Mulley J. C., et al., SCN1A mutations and epilepsy. Hum. Mutat. 25, 535-542 (2005)). Missense or frame-shift mutations in this gene are associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) (Ceulemans, B. P., et al., Clinical correlations of mutations in the SCN1A gene: from febrile seizures to severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Pediatric Neurol. 30, 236-243 (2004)) as well as a more severe disorder known as Dravet syndrome. Children with DS initially exhibit normal development but often experience febrile seizure episodes within the first year of life with eventual progression to severe spontaneous recurrent seizures, intellectual disability, ataxia, and psychomotor dysfunction. Seizures are inadequately managed using available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and these children are poor candidates for neurosurgical resection (Bender, A. C., et al., SCN1A mutations in Dravet syndrome: Impact of interneuron dysfunction on neural networks and cognitive outcome. Epilepsy Beh. 23, 177-186 (2012)).

In mammalian brain there are four main subtypes of voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunits: Na_(V)1.1, Na_(V)1.2, Na_(V)1.3 and Na_(V)1.6, encoded for by the genes SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN3A, and SCN8A, respectively. Opening of these channels produces a sodium conductance and rapid cell membrane depolarization e.g., features integral to action potential initiation (Catterall, W. A., et al., Na_(V)1.1 channels and epilepsy. J. Physiol. 588, 1849-1859 (2010)). In mice, Na_(V)1.1 is widely expressed in the central nervous system including the axon initial segment of parvalbumin-positive hippocampal interneurons and excitatory principal cells (Kim, D. Y., et al., Reduced sodium channel Na(v)1.1 levels in BACE1-null mice. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 8106-8116 (2011); Chen, C., et al., Mice lacking sodium channel beta1 subunits display defects in neuronal excitability, sodium channel expression, and nodal architecture. J. Neurosci. 24, 4030-4042 (2004)). Heterozygous deletion of Na_(V)1.1 in mice leads to a reduction in the firing capability of acutely dissociated fast-spiking interneurons (Yu, F. H., et al., Reduced sodium current in GABAergic interneurons in a mouse model of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1142-1149 (2006)). Mice with global or interneuron-specific heterozygous deletion of Na_(V)1.1 exhibit temperature-induced and spontaneous seizures, mild ataxia, autism-like behaviors and premature death (Yu, F. H., et al., Reduced sodium current in GABAergic interneurons in a mouse model of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1142-1149 (2006); Oakley, J. C., et al., Temperature- and age-dependent seizures in a mouse model of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3994-3999 (2009); Cheah, C. S., et al., Specific deletion of Na_(V)1.1 sodium channels in inhibitory interneurons causes seizures and premature death in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14646-14651 (2012)). Knock-in mouse carrying a premature stop codon in domain III of the Na_(V)1.1 channel also exhibit a decrement in spike amplitude during prolonged interneuron firing and increased sensitivity to temperature-induced seizures (Ogiwara, I., et al., Na_(V)1.1 localizes to axons of parvalbumin-positive inhibitory interneurons: a circuit basis for epileptic seizures in mice carrying an Scn1a gene mutation. J. Neurosci. 27, 5903-5914 (2007)).

Generation and characterization of valid animal models is critical to efforts to understand the pathophysiology of DS, and to aid in identification of novel therapies. While considerable attention has focused on modeling SCN1A mutations in mice these animals have proven difficult to breed and epilepsy phenotypes are strongly influenced by background strain genetics. Induced pluripotent stem cells can be generated from DS patients but individual neurons do not recapitulate the network environment necessary for in vivo seizure generation. Danio rerio (zebrafish), a simple vertebrate species, provide an alternative model system with significant advantages for genetic manipulation, cost-efficient breeding and in vivo drug discovery (Lessman, C. A., The developing zebrafish (Danio rerio): a vertebrate model for high-throughput screening of chemical libraries. Birth Defects Res. C. Embryo Today 93, 268-280 (2011); Delvecchio, C., et al., The zebrafish: a powerful platform for in vivo, HTS drug discovery. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 9, 354-361 (2011); Rinkwitz, S., et al., Zebrafish: an integrative system for neurogenomics and neurosciences. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 231-243 (2011)). Ideally, an animal model should be based on a known genetic cause of the disease (SCN1A mutation), accurately recapitulate key features of the disease (epilepsy), and respond, or not, to therapies commonly used in patients with the disease (pharmacological validation). If successful, such a model could inform the understanding of the disease process and catalyze explorations toward new therapies.

In zebrafish, the voltage-gated sodium channel family consists of four sets of duplicated genes: scn1Laa & scn1Lab, scn4aa & scn4ab, scn5Laa & scn5Lab, and scn8aa & scn8ab (Novak, A. E., et al., Embryonic and larval expression of zebrafish voltage-gated sodium channel alpha-subunit genes. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1962-1973 (2006)). The zebrafish scn1Lab gene shares a 77% identity with human SCN1A and is expressed in the central nervous system. A homozygous zebrafish mutant for this gene (originally termed didy^(s552)) was discovered in a chemical mutagenesis screen using the optokinetic response as an assay (Schoonheim, P. J., Arrenberg, A. B., Del Bene, F., & Baier H., Optogenetic localization and genetic perturbation of saccade-generating neurons in zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 30, 7111-7120 (2010)). These types of screens are based on inducing random point mutations using the alkylating agent N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), resulting mutations are typically loss-of-function and recessive. Although this is a homozygous mutation, scn1Lab zebrafish mutants are relevant for the autosomal dominant human Dravet Syndrome given the genome duplication in zebrafish and the presence of an additional Na_(V)1.1 homologue (scn1Laa). scn1Lab mutants were characterized at the molecular and behavioral level, demonstrated that mutants exhibit spontaneous drug-resistant seizures, and then used them in a novel high-throughput screening program to identify compounds that ameliorate the epilepsy phenotype. A phenotype-based screen identified clemizole, an FDA-approved compound, as an effective inhibitor of spontaneous convulsive behaviors and electrographic seizures in these mutants.

scn1Lab Expression and Characterization of Mutant Zebrafish

Zebrafish with a mutation in domain III of a voltage-gated sodium channel were identified by Dr. Herwig Baier during a chemical mutagenesis screen (Schoonheim, P. J., Arrenberg, A. B., Del Bene, F., & Baier H., Optogenetic localization and genetic perturbation of saccade-generating neurons in zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 30, 7111-7120 (2010)). Original scn1Lab mutants were backcrossed onto the Tupfel long (TL) background for 7-10 generations and confirmed a methionine (M) to arginine (R) mutation in the colony (FIG. 1A). Reverse transcriptase (RT) and quantitative (q) PCR revealed a decrease in mRNA expression for scn1Lab in mutant larvae at 3, 5 and 7 days post-fertilization (dpf) (FIG. 1B); antibodies recognizing this protein in zebrafish are not available. As expected (Novak, A. E., et al., Embryonic and larval expression of zebrafish voltage-gated sodium channel alpha-subunit genes. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1962-1973 (2006)), scn1Lab is prominently expressed during early stages of larval development (FIG. 1B) and specifically in the central nervous system at 3 dpf (FIGS. 1D, 1E). Whole-mount in situ hybridization revealed diffuse but prominent expression in brain regions corresponding to forebrain (telencephalon), optic tectum and cerebellum. A similar expression pattern was observed for scn1Laa at 3 dpf. At 5 and 7 dpf, CNS expression remained prominent and faint scn1Lab signal was also noted in the heart (FIG. 1D). Relative expression of scn8aa or scn8ab (Na_(V)1.6) e.g., a subunit thought to act as a genetic modifier of DS (Martin, M. S., et al., The voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a is a genetic modifier of severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Hum. Mol. Gen. 16, 2892-2899 (2007)), failed to reveal a significant difference in expression between mutants and sibling controls at 5 dpf (FIG. 1C). Similarly, microarray analysis at 5 dpf also failed to detect a compensatory change in the mRNA expression of thirteen different zebrafish scn subunits (Table I) including the other homolog (scn1Laa). These results demonstrate a selective defect in a zebrafish Na_(V)1.1 gene expressed in the CNS during early development.

Large-Scale Transcriptomic Analysis of scn1Lab Mutants.

Although inherited disorders of voltage-gated ion channels are recognized as an etiology of epilepsy, investigation of transcriptional changes has not been reported for any epilepsy-related channelopathy. To detect differences in gene expression in an unbiased manner an Agilent Danio rerio chip covering 44,000 probes (FIGS. 2A, 2B) was used. Hierarchical clustering analyses showed that ˜2.5% (1099) of these probes were differentially expressed between mutants and sibling controls at 5 dpf (p≤0.01, t test; 674 up-regulated and 425 down-regulated); 405 were assigned to an “unknown function” category. A list of 30 down- and up-regulated known genes showing the greatest differences in expression is shown in FIG. 2C. These differences were modest as 90% (990/1099) of the identified genes exhibited fold-changes between 0.8 and 2.0. Similar to microarray analysis of Mecp2 single-gene mutant mice (Jordan, C., et al., Cerebellar gene expression profiles of mouse models for Rett syndrome reveal novel MeCP2 targets. BMC Med. Genet. 8, 36 (2007)), many of the genes identified had no obvious CNS-related function and/or expression.

The two largest fold-changed genes, somatolactin β and a Na, K-ATPase, have expression primarily restricted to the pituitary (smtlb) (Lopez, M., et al., Expression of the somatolactin β gene during zebrafish embryonic development. Gene Expr. Patterns 6, 156-161 (2006)) or ear, intestinal bulb and pronephric duct (atp1a1a.5) (Blasiole, B., et al., Cloning, mapping, and developmental expression of a sixth zebrafish Na, K-ATPase alpha1 subunit gene (atp1a1a.5). Mech. Dev. 119, Suppl 1:S211-S214 (2002)). Probes for several genes related to apoptosis (casp8, casp8b and casp3b) did not reveal any statistically significant changes in the microarray studies. Of the genes with altered expression in scn1Lab mutants, six were previously implicated in neurological disorders e.g., pcdh19 (infantile epileptic encephalopathy), cyfip1 and fxr2 (Fragile X syndrome), ocr1 (Lowe syndrome), ubap2l (Parkinson's disease) and oca2 (Angelman syndrome). Microarray-based gene expression measurements were verified for 14 randomly selected genes using qPCR (FIG. 3A).

Biological functions were assigned to all genes using gene ontology (GO) annotations and the 482 genes showing at least a 1.5-fold change in expression and a p value <0.01 were categorized further (FIG. 3C). Calcium ion binding genes include annexinA1c, A1b and 2a, spectrin α2, neurexin 2a, calsyntenin 1 and parvalbumin 3. Significant changes in a gap junction channel (cx43), a gene involved in clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels at the axon initial segment (spna2) and the ubiquitin domain of a GABA receptor (map1lc3b) were also noted. Three additional genes not found on the microarray were chosen for qPCR analysis (FIG. 3B): hcn1, a gene shown to be correlated with SCN1A using data mining and down-regulated in several seizure models (Noam, Y., et al., Towards an integrated view of HCN channel role in epilepsy. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 873-879 (2011)) was significantly reduced in scn1Lab mutants compared to sibling control (p<0.05 2-tail Student's t-test). However, homer and bdnf, e.g., genes involved in synaptogenesis related to the formation of recurrent excitatory synapses and epilepsy (Avedissian, M., et al., Hippocampal gene expression analysis using the ORESTES methodology shows that homer 1a mRNA is upregulated in the acute period of the pilocarpine epilepsy model. Hippocampus 17, 130-136 (2007); Tongiorgi, E., et al., Brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA and protein are targeted to discrete dendritic laminas by events that trigger epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. 24, 6842-6852 (2004)) were unchanged.

Spontaneous Seizures in scn1Lab Mutant Zebrafish

scn1Lab mutants were monitored for evidence of spontaneous electrographic seizures starting at 3 dpf e.g., the first larval stage at which epileptiform discharge can be detected (Baraban, S. C., et al., A large-scale mutagenesis screen to identify seizure-resistant zebrafish. Epilepsia 48, 1151-157 (2007); Hortopan, G. A., et al., Spontaneous seizures and altered gene expression in GABA signaling pathways in a mind bomb mutant zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 30, 13718-13728 (2010); Hunt, R. F., Hortopan, G. A., Gillespie, A., & Baraban, S. C., A novel zebrafish model of hyperthermia-induced seizures reveals a role for TRPV4 channels and NMDA-type glutamate receptors. Exp. Neurol. 237, 199-206 (2012); Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005); Chege, S. W., Hortopan, G. A., Dinday, M. T., & Baraban, S. C., Expression and function of KCNQ channels in larval zebrafish. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 186-198 (2012)). Mutant larvae were identified by their “black” appearance (FIG. 4A), which is indicative of a defect in pigment aggregation and die prematurely between 10 and 12 dpf, as reported previously (Novak, A. E., et al., Embryonic and larval expression of zebrafish voltage-gated sodium channel alpha-subunit genes. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1962-1973 (2006)). Forebrain extracellular field recordings from paralyzed and agar-immobilized scn1Lab mutants were marked by frequent brief interictal-like bursts and large-amplitude long duration ictal-like events starting at 3 dpf (n=4) and progressively becoming more prominent between 4 and 7 dpf (n=132) (FIG. 2C). These events were confirmed in 100% of mutants at 3 dpf, 100% at 4 dpf, 97% at 5 dpf, 98% at 6 dpf and 100% at 7 dpf.

Abnormal electrical events were not observed in age-matched sibling controls at any developmental stage (n=36). Hyperthermia-induced seizures (Hunt, R. F., Hortopan, G. A., Gillespie, A., & Baraban, S. C., A novel zebrafish model of hyperthermia-induced seizures reveals a role for TRPV4 channels and NMDA-type glutamate receptors. Exp. Neurol. 237, 199-206 (2012)) could be evoked in 5 dpf scn1Lab mutants and controls at apparently similar temperature thresholds (mutant: 26.9±0.5 C°; n=14; control: 25.9±0.5 C°; n=14; p=0.164 t-test). However, these measurements were complicated, in mutants, by simultaneous occurrence of high frequency spontaneous epileptiform discharges. Mutants had elevated levels of swim activity and exhibited unprovoked seizure-like behavior consisting of whole-body convulsions and rapid undirected movement starting at 4 dpf (n=36). A representative locomotion tracking plot of a scn1Lab mutant showing hyperactivity and convulsive behavior is shown in FIG. 4B. This behavior is similar to that classified as a Stage III seizure in larvae exposed to pentylenetetrazole (Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005)). Seizure behaviors were never observed in controls at any stage of development (n=36). In pools of mutant and sibling control larvae, scn1Lab mutants stay close to the sides of the petri dish, which is considered a form of thigmotaxis in fish (Ellis, L. D., Seibert, J., & Soanes, K. H., Distinct modes of induced hyperactivity in zebrafish larvae. Brain Res. 1449, 46-59 (2012)). These results reveal a striking epilepsy phenotype in scn1Lab mutant zebrafish.

Pharmacological Evaluation of scn1Lab Mutant Zebrafish

Seizures associated with SCN1A mutations are poorly responsive to most AEDs. To evaluate pharmaco-sensitivity spontaneous electrographic seizures were recorded in agar-embedded scn1Lab mutants (5-6 dpf) under baseline conditions, and again after application of a commercially available AED. All drugs were bath applied at a concentration of 1 mM; seven fish were tested for each drug. Epileptiform event frequency (including interictal- and ictal-like discharges) and the fractional time spent seizing in scn1Lab mutants were reduced by valproate, diazepam, potassium bromide and stiripentol (FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5D). Burst durations were not significantly changed for any of these drug exposures (FIG. 5C).

As expected, most AEDs had no effect and epileptiform activity became more frequent following exposure to carbamazepine (in 2 of 7 fish), ethosuximide (4 of 7 fish) or vigabatrin (6 of 7 fish). Because DS children often respond to the ketogenic diet (KD) (Dravet, C., et al., Severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy: Dravet syndrome. Adv. Neurol. 95, 71-102 (2005)) a separate clutch of scn1Lab mutants was exposed, siblings and WT controls to a form of the diet for 48 hr starting at 4 dpf. Locomotion tracking data on KD-exposed larvae at 6 dpf confirm a reduction in seizure-like behavior to control levels in 7 of 10 mutants (FIG. 5E; mean velocity, treated mutants=0.43±0.09 mm/sec, n=16; un-treated mutants=0.81±0.05 mm/sec, n=28; p<0.05 Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on Ranks with a Dunn's pairwise multiple comparison). No significant differences in swim behavior were noted in sibling controls treated with the KD (mean velocity=0.63±0.05 mm/sec, n=20) compared to un-treated WT larvae at 6 dpf (mean velocity=0.62±0.07 mm/sec; n=20). Acute exposure (20 min) to the diet had no effect on mutant seizure behavior in the locomotion assay (n=14; change in mean velocity <34%). Subsequent forebrain field recordings obtained from the same zebrafish used in the locomotion assay (FIG. 5F, top trace) confirmed the occurrence of spontaneous epileptiform discharge for embryo media exposed scn1Lab mutants and a suppression of burst activity in mutants exposed to the KD for 48 hr (FIG. 5F, bottom trace). These results demonstrate that the pharmacological profile for scn1Lab mutants resembles that seen in children with DS.

High-Throughput Drug Screening in scn1Lab Mutants

Because behavioral seizure activity is easily and rapidly monitored using a locomotion tracking format (Baraban, S. C., et al., A large-scale mutagenesis screen to identify seizure-resistant zebrafish. Epilepsia 48, 1151-157 (2007); Hortopan, G. A., et al., Spontaneous seizures and altered gene expression in GABA signaling pathways in a mind bomb mutant zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 30, 13718-13728 (2010); Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005); Chege, S. W., Hortopan, G. A., Dinday, M. T., & Baraban, S. C., Expression and function of KCNQ channels in larval zebrafish. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 186-198 (2012); Berghmans, S., Hunt, J., Roach, A., & Goldsmith, P., Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 75, 18-28 (2007); Baxendale, S., et al., Identification of compounds with anti-convulsant properties in a zebrafish model of epileptic seizures. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 773-774 (2012); Cario, C. L., Farrell, T. C., Milanese, C., & Burton, E. A., Automated measurement of zebrafish larval movement. J. Physiol. 589, 3703-3708 (2011); Winter, M. J., et al., Validation of a larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early-stage development drugs. J. Pharm. Tox. Methods 5, 176-187 (2008); Orellana-Paucar, A. M., et al., Anticonvulsant activity of bisabolene sesquiterpenoids of Curcuma longa in zebrafish and mouse seizure models. Epilepsy Beh. 24, 14-22 (2012) (FIGS. 4B and 5B1).

A high-throughput phenotype-based strategy was designed to screen chemical libraries for compounds that reduce mutant behavior to Stage 0 (very little swim activity) or Stage I (increased, but non-convulsive, swim activity) e.g., behavior equivalent to that seen in normal WT mutants. Automated measurement of larval activity was achieved using ETHOVISION® tracking software (Noldus Information Technology) and a high-speed camera. Previous studies confirmed that high velocity movement≥20 mm/sec correspond to paroxysmal seizure-like convulsions (Stage III) (Winter, M. J., et al., Validation of a larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early-stage development drugs. J. Pharm. Tox. Methods 5, 176-187 (2008); Orellana-Paucar, A. M., et al., Anticonvulsant activity of bisabolene sesquiterpenoids of Curcuma longa in zebrafish and mouse seizure models. Epilepsy Beh. 24, 14-22 (2012)).

Using a 96-well format, mutant swim activity at baseline was automatically tracked, and then again after addition of a test compound (100 μl); each compound was tested on 6 to 12 individual larvae at 5 dpf. The change in mutant swim activity between two consecutive recording epochs in embryo media was taken as baseline and is shown in FIG. 6A (n=28). Based on a standard deviation of 17.3 for baseline recordings associated simply with a solution exchange, compounds that inhibited movement (measured as a change in mean velocity) by >34% were screened for. To validate this approach, eleven AEDs and the KD were first screened using this assay. As expected from electrophysiological assays (FIGS. 5A-5F), diazepam, potassium bromide, stiripentol, valproate and a 48 hr exposure to KD effectively inhibited seizure behavior in the locomotion-based assay (FIG. 6B); ganaxolone, a neuroactive steroid related to allopregnalone, was also effective. Next, test compounds were screened at an initial concentration of 667 μM from a library that included US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and toxicology tested drugs.

Among the 320 compounds screened in vivo, 18 were found to significantly inhibit spontaneous seizures in scn1Lab mutants to levels comparable to Stage 0 or Stage I behavior and/or reduce mean swim velocity (circles in FIG. 6C). These 18 compounds were then re-tested on a separate clutch of scn1Lab mutants at concentrations of 667, 67 and 6.7 μM. In the initial screen, 81 compounds were identified as lethal i.e., no visible heartbeat or movement in response to touch after a 30 min exposure and were re-evaluated at a dilution of 1:100; none of these advanced further. The drug library included a number of additional compounds with putative anti convulsant properties (beclamide, aminohydroxybutyric acid, and tiletamine) that were also ineffective in the 96-well locomotion assay at 667 μM. 14 of the re-tested compounds either failed to successfully inhibit seizure behavior in a second clutch of scn1Lab mutants or only suppressed behavior at the highest drug concentration. Next 4 (out of 18) compounds that were effective in reducing seizure-induced swim activity and mean velocity at all three drug concentrations for further testing were selected: zoxazolamine, clemizole HCl, clorgiline HCl and tolperisone HCl (FIG. 6D). Each of these compounds was evaluated a third time in the locomotion assay at a concentration of 100 μM, and subsequently monitored for forebrain electrographic activity. Clorgiline (a monoamine oxidase A inhibitor) and the muscle relaxants zoxazolamine (Hadra, R. & Millichap J. G., Quantitative assessment of motor function in cerebral palsy: evaluation of zoxazolamine (flexin), a new muscular relaxant agent. Neurology 6, 843-852 (1956)) and tolperisone (Sakitama, K., The effects of centrally acting muscle relaxants on the intrathecal noradrenaline-induced facilitation of the flexor reflex mediated by group II afferent fibers in rats. Jpn. J Pharmacol. 63, 369-736 (1993)) were identified as “false positives” because they reduced swim activity at this concentration but when the same mutant was embedded in agar electrographic seizure events were still observed (see FIG. 6E).

Only one compound, clemizole (antihistamine and NS4B RNA binding inhibitor) (Finkelstein, M., Kromer, C. M., Sweeney, S. A., & Delahunt C. S., Some aspects of the pharmacology of clemizole hydrochloride. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 49, 18-22 (1960); Einav, S., Sobol, H. D., Gehrig, E., & Glenn J. S., Discovery of a hepatitis C target and its pharmacological inhibitors by microfluidic affinity analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1019-1027 (2008)), was effective in suppressing spontaneous seizure activity in both assays (FIGS. 6D-6E). Clemizole had no significant effect on seizure behavior in the locomotion assay at concentrations between 6.25 and 50 μM (n=33). As an additional evaluation of the therapeutic potential for acute clemizole treatment, it was demonstrated that 100 μM clemizole was effective in reducing seizure behavior in WT zebrafish exposed to 15 mM pentylenetetrazole (FIG. 6D; n=10) i.e., a model of acute seizures based on GABA receptor antagonism. These results suggest that scn1Lab mutants can be used in a high-throughput screen to identify potential lead compounds for Dravet syndrome.

The scn1Lab zebrafish mutant described here is the first simple vertebrate model of a sodium channel mutation that recapitulates features of Dravet syndrome, a catastrophic form of drug-resistant epilepsy in children. These mutants exhibit hyperactivity, including convulsive behavior, spontaneous electrographic seizures, shortened lifespan and a pharmacological profile similar to the human condition. Additional molecular analysis of scn1Lab mutants suggests the absence of gross changes in global gene expression and a lack of compensation, at the RNA level, by other voltage-gated Na⁺ channel subunits. A two-stage phenotype-based drug screening strategy to identify lead compounds with the potential to ameliorate epilepsy phenotypes associated with SCN1A mutation identified one FDA-approved drug (clemizole).

Electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is typically normal in the first year of life for DS patients with an evolution to abnormal paroxysmal and polyspike activity between 1 and 9 years of age. This age-dependent pattern was mimicked in developing zebrafish larvae at ages where scn1a expression was significant. Forebrain extracellular recordings in very young larvae (3 dpf) appeared largely normal with the occasional small burst of polyspike activity. Frequent brief interictal-like activity with large amplitude polyspike burst discharges became more prominent as larvae aged. The architecture of these electrical events resembled those previously described in wild-type larvae exposed to pentylenetetrazole (Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005)), 4-aminopyridine (Baraban, S. C., et al., A large-scale mutagenesis screen to identify seizure-resistant zebrafish. Epilepsia 48, 1151-157 (2007)), linopirdine (Chege, S. W., Hortopan, G. A., Dinday, M. T., & Baraban, S. C., Expression and function of KCNQ channels in larval zebrafish. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 186-198 (2012)) or hyperthermia (Hunt, R. F., Hortopan, G. A., Gillespie, A., & Baraban, S. C., A novel zebrafish model of hyperthermia-induced seizures reveals a role for TRPV4 channels and NMDA-type glutamate receptors. Exp. Neurol. 237, 199-206 (2012)).

The appearance of electrographic seizure activity corresponds with hyperactivity, full-body convulsions with associated high-velocity swim activity and brief loss-of-posture in freely behaving mutants. These types of spontaneous behaviors are never observed in wild-type larvae and, again, resemble those previously observed only during exposure to convulsant drugs. These behaviors are an indirect indicator of seizure activity and could be used for rapid in vivo evaluation of drug treatments and lethality in a multi-well format using automated locomotion tracking software (Berghmans, S., Hunt, J., Roach, A., & Goldsmith, P., Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 75, 18-28 (2007); Baxendale, S., et al., Identification of compounds with anti-convulsant properties in a zebrafish model of epileptic seizures. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 773-774 (2012); Winter, M. J., et al., Validation of a larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early-stage development drugs. J. Pharm. Tox. Methods 5, 176-187 (2008)). Seizures in scn1Lab zebrafish mutants were responsive to the ketogenic diet and four AEDs (e.g., valproate, benzodiazepine, potassium bromide and stiripentol) prescribed clinically for patients with DS.

Interestingly, electrographic seizure events in scn1Lab mutants remained unchanged (or perhaps worsened) in response to several commercially available AEDs. While it is possible that drug concentrations higher than 1 mM could be required to abolish electrical events, these would be considered high and potentially non-selective concentrations. In drug trials using an acute PTZ-induced seizure model in larval zebrafish (Baraban, S. C., et al., A large-scale mutagenesis screen to identify seizure-resistant zebrafish. Epilepsia 48, 1151-157 (2007); Berghmans, S., Hunt, J., Roach, A., & Goldsmith, P., Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 75, 18-28 (2007); Baxendale, S., et al., Identification of compounds with anti-convulsant properties in a zebrafish model of epileptic seizures. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 773-774 (2012); Afrikanova, T., et al., Validation of the zebrafish pentylenetetrazol seizure model: locomotor versus electrographic responses to antiepileptic drugs. PLoS One 8, e54166 (2013)), AED concentrations of 1 mM and below were often sufficient for assessing antiepileptic activity. With a failure to respond to seven different AEDs this model fits the clinical definition of drug-resistant epilepsy (de Toffol, B., et al., ESPERA study: Applicability of the new ILAE criteria for antiepileptic drug resistance of focal epilepsies in current clinical practice. Epilepsy Beh 25, 166-169 (2012)).

For nearly 40 years, the discovery and identification of new AEDs has almost entirely been based upon preclinical animal models of acquired or acute seizures in rodents (Loscher, W. & Schmidt, D., Modern antiepileptic drug development has failed to deliver: Ways out of the current dilemma. Epilepsia 52, 657-658 (2011)). This approach successfully identified drugs that block generalized tonic-clonic seizures in humans (Bialer, M. & White H. S., Key factors in the discovery and development of new antiepileptic drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 10-19 (2012)) but remains time-consuming, resource intensive, expensive and laborious. While testing against PTZ or other types of acquired seizures in zebrafish larvae may be more efficient than similar assays in rodents (Berghmans, S., Hunt, J., Roach, A., & Goldsmith, P., Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 75, 18-28 (2007); Baxendale, S., et al., Identification of compounds with anti-convulsant properties in a zebrafish model of epileptic seizures. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 773-774 (2012) Afrikanova, T., et al., Validation of the zebrafish pentylenetetrazol seizure model: locomotor versus electrographic responses to antiepileptic drugs. PLoS One 8, e54166 (2013)), they ultimately should identify the same classes of compounds.

In contrast, here is described an alternative screening strategy using a 96-well format for rapid automated behavioral monitoring followed by a sensitive electrophysiological assay of spontaneous electrographic seizure activity in a mutant fish mimicking a known human genetic disorder. This in vivo strategy simultaneously monitors lethality and is not limited to SCN1A, but could be applied to any epilepsy disorder. Indeed, this phenotype-based approach could form the basis of a genetically informed or “personalized” approach to drug discovery. While genetically modified mice mimicking known SCN1A mutations and exhibiting epilepsy have been developed, breeding can be complicated, background strain can modify seizure phenotypes and AEDs are rarely tested in these animals. For example, in Scn1a^(RX/+) mutant mice stiripentol and clobazam were only evaluated for effects on hyperthermia-induced seizure thresholds (Cao, D., et al., Efficacy of stiripentol in hyperthermia-induced seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Epilepsia 53, 1140-1145 (2012)). Treatment of Scn1a^(+/−) mutant mice with clonazepam, an allosteric modulator of GABA-A receptors, rescued some of the autistic-like behaviors but was not evaluated as an antiepileptic (de Toffol, B., et al., ESPERA study: Applicability of the new ILAE criteria for antiepileptic drug resistance of focal epilepsies in current clinical practice. Epilepsy Beh 25, 166-169 (2012)).

Where drug-resistant rodent epilepsy models have been described, such as the subgroup of wild-type rats selected from kindling or post-status epilepticus models (Han, S., et al., Autistic-like behaviour in Scn1a+/− mice and rescue by enhanced GABA-mediated neurotransmission. Nature 489, 385-390 (2012)), they remain only poorly characterized and are not suitable to initial high-throughput stages of drug screening. In contrast, using a zebrafish scn1Lab mutant with greater than 75% sequence identity for a human sodium channel mutation, a large-scale transcriptomic profiling of over 44,000 probes was completed, demonstrated a developmental progression of scn1Lab channel expression and epileptic phenotypes, analyzed the effects of available antiepileptic therapies, and screened a 320 compound chemical library against spontaneous unprovoked seizures. Although this first proof-of-principle screen was accomplished at one fish per well, 6 to 12 fish per trial and one trial per week, the ease with which zebrafish could be scaled upward (especially in a commercial setting) to study hundreds to thousands of larvae per week make this an attractive system for a rapid large-scale first-stage in vivo drug discovery program. Simultaneous in vivo evaluation of toxicity—one of the greatest sources of failure in moving lead compounds from the bench to the clinic—is a critical advantage of this approach over available organotypic hippocampal culture- or in silica-based screening strategies.

Although any animal model drug discovery data should be treated cautiously, clemizole, a compound with H1 antagonist and NS4B RNA inhibiting properties, is an FDA-approved drug with a safe toxicology profile emerged from this screen and offers an exciting starting point for further research. For example, although it was recently recognized that antihistamines inhibit induced seizures in neonatal rats (Yamada, K., Takizawa, F., Tamura, T., & Kanda T., The effect of antihistamines on seizures induced by increasing-current electroshocks: ketotifen, but not olopatadine, promotes the seizures in infant rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 35, 693-697 (2012)), without being bound by any particular theory, this is likely not the mechanism of action here. We demonstrated four other H1 antihistamines (pimethixene maleate, chloropyramine HCl, mebhydrolin napthalenesulfonate and iproheptine) failed to suppress convulsive behavior in scn1Lab mutants. Furthermore, evidence suggests the potential for H1 antihistamines to adversely modify seizures in children (Miyata, I., Saegusa, H., & Sakurai, M., Seizure-modifying potential of histamine H1 antagonists: a clinical observation. Pediatr. Int. 53, 706-708 (2011)) indicating that more detailed analysis will be required to identify a mechanism of action. Given that clemizole was also effective in a zebrafish version of the Metrazol test it may be worthwhile to pursue additional pre-clinical testing in the NIH-sponsored Anticonvulsant Drug Development Program at the University of Utah. Most importantly, these studies suggest that in vivo drug screening and experimental analysis of scn1Lab mutant zebrafish could prove extremely valuable to understanding (and treatment) of Dravet syndrome.

Animals.

Scn1Lab (didy^(s552)) zebrafish embryos were a kind gift from Herwig Baier. Adult HuC:GFP zebrafish were a kind gift from Stephen Ekker. Zebrafish were generated and maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the University of California, San Francisco Committee on the Use and Care of Animals. Zebrafish larvae were maintained in “embryo medium” consisting of 0.03% Instant Ocean (Aquarium Systems, Inc., Mentor, Ohio, U.S.A.) in deionized water containing 0.002% Methylene Blue as a fungicide. Larval zebrafish clutches were bred from scn1Lab heterozygous animals that had been backcrossed to TL wild-type or HuC:GFP zebrafish for at least 7 generations. Homozygous mutants (sorted based on pigmentation) and age-matched sibling larvae were used. Although the precise genetic defect responsible for the skin pigmentation issue is unknown, it is interesting that a 1.5-fold up-regulation of a gene encoding the melanocortin 5a receptor was noted in the microarray data.

Seizure Monitoring.

Procedures for locomotion tracking and electrophysiology were described (Baraban, S. C., et al., A large-scale mutagenesis screen to identify seizure-resistant zebrafish. Epilepsia 48, 1151-157 (2007); Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005)). In pilot experiments, HuC:GFP zebrafish were used in electrophysiology experiments to obtain an estimation of the location of recording electrodes. Locomotion plots were obtained for one fish per well at a recording epoch of 10 min using a DANIOVISION® system running ETHOVISION® XT software (Noldus Information Technology; Leesburg, Va.). Seizure scoring was performed as described (Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005)). Locomotion plots were analyzed for distance traveled (in mm) and mean velocity (in mm/sec). Epileptiform events were analyzed in PCLAMP™ (Molecular Devices; Sunnyvale, Calif.) and defined as upward or downward membrane deflections greater than 2× baseline noise level and classified as either interictal-like (100 to 300 msec duration) or ictal-like (1000 to 5000 msec duration). Burst frequency was determined by counting the number of epileptiform events per minute during a 10-min recording epoch. Burst duration was determined by measuring the onset-to-offset interval for all events during the same epoch.

Drugs were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in embryo media. Stock solutions were prepared in embryo media at 1 mM and pH adjusted to −7.5. Ganaxolone was a kind gift from BioCrea GmbH (Radebeul, Germany). Compounds for drug screening were purchased from MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc. (International Drug Collection; Gaylordsville, Conn.) and were provided as 10 mM DMSO solutions. Test compounds were dissolved in embryo media and tested at concentrations between 6.7 and 667 μM; final DMSO concentration ˜7%. An initial screen concentration of 667 μM was chosen for behavioral studies in freely swimming fish as this falls on the lower range of AED concentrations previously reported in to be effective against PTZ (10-20 mM) induced seizures in larval zebrafish (0.1 to 25 mM) Baraban, S. C., Taylor, M. R., Castro, P. A., & Baier H., Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression. Neuroscience 131, 759-768 (2005); Berghmans, S., Hunt, J., Roach, A., & Goldsmith, P., Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res. 75, 18-28 (2007); Afrikanova, T., et al., Validation of the zebrafish pentylenetetrazol seizure model: locomotor versus electrographic responses to antiepileptic drugs. PLoS One 8, e54166 (2013)) and was the most efficient use of the small volume of stock solution (250 μL) provided by MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc. A slightly higher concentration (1 mM) was chosen for the initial AED validation assays in FIGS. 5A-5F and 6A-6E to account for any potential complications associated with diffusion through the agar. DMSO was evaluated for toxicity at dilutions between 0.01 and 100% using wild-type larvae (n=12 fish per concentration); DMSO at >25% was lethal.

In all drug screening studies compounds were coded and experiments were performed by investigators blind to the nature of the compound. Baseline recordings of seizure activity were obtained from mutants bathed in embryo media; a second plot was then obtained following a solution change to a test compound. Each test compound classified as a “positive hit” in the locomotion assay was visually confirmed as alive based on movement in response to touch and visible heartbeat. WT fish exhibit little to no spontaneous swim activity during these 10 min recording epochs (see FIG. 3B) and were not used in the drug discovery assay.

Procedures for microarray, quantitative PCR and whole-mount in situ hybridization were described (Hortopan, G. A., et al., Spontaneous seizures and altered gene expression in GABA signaling pathways in a mind bomb mutant zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 30, 13718-13728 (2010)).

Data are presented as mean and SEM, unless stated otherwise. Pairwise statistical significance was determined with Student's two-tailed unpaired t-test, ANOVA or Mann-Whitney rank sum test, as appropriate, unless stated otherwise. Results were considered significant at P<0.05, unless otherwise indicated.

Example 2

Based on our previous discussion and some activity observed at the 100 and 300 mg/kg doses in the qualitative MES screen in mice, we proceeded with quantitative testing in the MES/scMET/Tox mouse model to determine the ED50/TD50. During the determination of the TPE in the MES model, no activity was observed at the 300 mg/kg starting dose. However, activity was observed at the 500 mg/kg dose with 2/4 animals protected at 0.25 min and 4/4 animals protected at 30 minutes. No activity or toxicity (unable to grasp rotorod) was observed at any other dose or time point tested. No activity was observed in the scMET model. The data in the MES model shows that there is significant activity/protection with ASP469016 in this mouse model with an ED50<400 mg/kg.

Anticonvulsant Screening Results—Mice IP Quantification

ASP ID: 469016 * Screen ID: 1 Sponsor ID: 642 Sponsor Class: ASP/CM Sponsor Solvent Code: MC Solvent Prep: M&P, TW Animal Weight: -g Date Started: 06-May-2014 Date Completed: 09-May-2014 Reference: 503:294,297.509:3,4. ED₅₀ Value

Test Time(Hrs) ED50 95% Confidence Interval Slope STD Err PI Value MES 0.5 <400.0 — SCMET 0.5 >250.0 — TOX 0.5 >500 — ED₅₀ Biological Response

Test Time (Hrs) Dose (mg/kg) Dths N/F C MES 0.5 350 0/8 MES 0.5 400 7/8 MES 0.5 500 4/4 SCMET 0.5 200 0/8 SCMET 0.5 250 0/4 TOX 0.5 500 0/4 Note: Presence of an asterisk (*) indicates that there are multiple comment codes. Time to Peak Effect

Time (Hours) Dose 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 24 3.0 Test (mg/kg) Dths N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C MES 300 0/4 0/4 0/4 0/4 0/4 / / / / MES 500 2/4 4/4 0/4 0/4 0/4 / / / / TOX 400 0/8 0/8 / / / / / / / TOX 500 0/4 0/4 0/4 / / / / / / Note: N/F = number of animals active or toxic ovedr the number tested. C = Comment code. Presence of an asterisk (*) indicates that there are multiple comment codes. MES doses 350 m/kg and 400 mg/kg and Scmet dose 200 m/kg were done with the Ori batch and all the other doses were done with the A batch.

Example 3

ASP469016 was tested in our initial T31 (MES/scMET/Tox) screen at 30, 100, and 300 mg/kg. The data for each condition is presented as N/F, where N equals the number of animals protected and F equals the number of animals tested. For tests of toxicity (TOX), N equals the number of animals displaying toxic effects and F equals the number of animals tested. Codes in the C column refer to comments from the technicians performing the experiment and are defined in the comments section if necessary. Any deaths are noted. As shown in the 6 Hz (32 mA) model only 1/4 animals were protected at 100 mg/kg at 30 min. In the MES-induced seizure model only 1/4 animals were protected at 100 and 300 mg/kg at 30 min. No toxicity (unable to grasp rotorod) or activity was detected at any other dose or time point tested.

Anticonvulsant Screening Results—Mice IVIES and 6 Hz Identification

ASP ID: 469016 U Screen ID: 1 Sponsor ID: 642 Sponsor Class: ASP/CM Sponsor Solvent Code: MC Solvent Prep: M&P, SB Route Code: IP Animal Weight -g 6Hz 32 Date Started: 11-Feb-2014 Date Completed: 11-Feb-2014 Current (mA): Reference: 503:153. Response

Time (Hours) 0.5 2.0 0.3 1.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 8.0 24 Test Dose Form Dths N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C N/F C 6 Hz 30 0/4 0/4 / / / / / / / 6 Hz 100 1/4 0/4 / / / / / / / 6 Hz 300 0/4 0/4 / / / / / / / MES 30 0/4 0/4 / / / / / / / MES 100 1/4 0/4 / / / / / / / MES 300 1/4 0/4 / / / / / / / TOX 30 SUS 0/8 0/8 / / / / / / / TOX 100 SUS 0/8 0/8 / / / / / / / TOX 300 SUS 0/8 0/8 / / / / / / / Note: N/F = number of animals active or toxic over the number tested. C = Comment code. Presence of an asterist (*) indicates that there are multiple comment codes.

IV. Embodiments Embodiment P1

A method of treating an epileptic disorder, said method comprising administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, an analog thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment P2

The method of embodiment P1, wherein said epileptic disorder is Dravet Syndrome.

Embodiment P3

The method of any one of embodiments P1 to P2, wherein said clemizole inhibits compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures.

Embodiment P4

The method of any one of embodiments P1 to P3, wherein said clemizole is administered as a pharmaceutical composition.

Embodiment 1

A method of treating an epilepsy disorder, said method comprising administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment 2

The method of embodiment 1, wherein said epilepsy disorder is Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, infantile spasm, or Ohtahara Syndrome.

Embodiment 3

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 2, wherein said epilepsy disorder is Dravet Syndrome.

Embodiment 4

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 3, wherein said epilepsy disorder is a pediatric epilepsy disorder.

Embodiment 5

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 4, wherein said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof inhibits compulsive behaviors or electrographic seizures in an epilepsy subject, a Alzheimer's disease subject, autism subject, or Parkinson's disease subject.

Embodiment 6

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 5, wherein said administration of said clemizole, said clemizole analog or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof reduces the incidence of unprovoked seizures in said subject in the absence of said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment 7

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 6, wherein said administration of said clemizole, said clemizole analog or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof reduces or prevents myoclonus seizures or status epilepticus in said subject in the absence of said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment 8

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 7, wherein said subject has a ketogenic diet.

Embodiment 9

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 8, wherein said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to said subject at an amount of about 0.1 mg to about 1000 mg per kg body weight.

Embodiment 10

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 9, wherein said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to said subject in a daily dose of about 0.1 mg to about 1000 mg per kg body weight to said subject.

Embodiment 11

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 10, wherein said pharmaceutically acceptable salt is clemizole HCl.

Embodiment 12

The method of any one of embodiments 1 to 11, wherein said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is co-administered with an anti-epileptic drug (AED).

Embodiment 13

The method of embodiment 12, wherein said AED is acetazolamide, benzodiazepine, cannabadiols, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, ethotoin, felbamate, fenfluramine, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, ganaxolone, huperzine A, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, nitrazepam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, potassium bromide, pregabalin, primidone, retigabine, rufinamide, sodium valproate, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or zonisamide.

Embodiment 14

The method of embodiment 13, wherein said AED is valproic acid, valproate, clonazepam, ethosuximide, felbamate, gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, benzodiazepine, phenobarbital, pregabalin, primidone, tiagabine, topiramate, potassium bromide, phenytoin, stiripentol, vigabatrin, or zonisamide.

Embodiment 15

The method of embodiment 14, wherein said AED is valproic acid, valproate, Gabapentin, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or vigabatrin.

Embodiment 16

The method of embodiments 12 to 15, wherein said AED is administered simultaneously with or sequentially with said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment 17

The method of embodiments 1 to 16, wherein said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered as a pharmaceutical composition.

Embodiment 18

The method of claim 17, wherein said pharmaceutical composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.

Embodiment 19

The method of any one of embodiments 17 to 18, wherein said pharmaceutical composition comprises a therapeutically effective amount of said clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

Embodiment 20

The method of any one of embodiments 17 to 19, wherein said pharmaceutically acceptable salt is clemizole HCl.

Embodiment 21

The method of any one of embodiments 17 to 19, wherein said pharmaceutical composition is co-administered with an anti-epileptic drug (AED).

Embodiment 22

The method of embodiment 21, wherein said AED is acetazolamide, benzodiazepine, cannabadiols, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, ethotoin, felbamate, fenfluramine, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, ganaxolone, huperzine A, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, nitrazepam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, potassium bromide, pregabalin, primidone, retigabine, rufinamide, sodium valproate, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or zonisamide.

Embodiment 23

The method of any one of embodiments 21 to 22, wherein said pharmaceutical composition comprises clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and an AED.

Embodiment 24

The method of one of embodiments 21 to 23, wherein said pharmaceutical composition comprises clemizole, said clemizole analog, or said pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and an AED.

Embodiment 25

A pharmaceutical composition comprising clemizole, a clemizole analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in treating an epilepsy disorder.

Embodiment 26

The pharmaceutical composition of embodiment 25, wherein said pharmaceutical composition is co-administered with an AED. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of treating an epilepsy disorder, said method comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of: (i) a clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; and (ii) an anti-epilepsy drug, wherein the clemizole analog is:


2. The method of claim 1, wherein the anti-epilepsy drug is acetazolamide, benzodiazepine, cannabadiols, carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, ethotoin, felbamate, fenfluramine, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, ganaxolone, huperzine A, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, nitrazepam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, potassium bromide, pregabalin, primidone, retigabine, rufinamide, sodium valproate, stiripentol, tiagabine, vigabatrin, or zonisamide.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises administration of a dose of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to said subject of about 1 mg/kg to about 1000 mg/kg body weight.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the dose is about 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises oral or intravenous administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and oral or parental administration of the anti-epilepsy drug to said subject.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug are formulated as separate single dosage units, and the administering comprises administering the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug separately.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises co-administering the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug simultaneously in one dosage unit.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises oral administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises parental administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug simultaneously.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug sequentially.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the administering comprises administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug at least once a day.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the administering comprises administration of the clemizole analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the anti-epilepsy drug every 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 20, or 24 hours.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the clemizole analog is


15. The method of claim 1, wherein the clemizole analog is


16. The method of claim 1, wherein the clemizole analog is 